Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e37844.
doi: 10.2196/37844.

Cultural and Digital Health Literacy Appropriateness of App- and Web-Based Systems Designed for Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Cultural and Digital Health Literacy Appropriateness of App- and Web-Based Systems Designed for Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review

Yosefa Birati et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing dramatically. Mobile technologies to enhance patient self-management offer many advantages for women diagnosed with GDM. However, to our knowledge, although mobile health (mHealth) and telemedicine systems for GDM management exist, evidence on their cultural and digital health literacy appropriateness levels is limited.

Objective: This review aimed to search and assess the literature on mHealth and telemedicine systems designed for women diagnosed with GDM. Our assessment of these technologies focused on their cultural and digital health literacy appropriateness as well as the systems' effectiveness in improving glycemic control and maternal and infant outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using a framework adapted from Arksey and O'Malley. Four electronic databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, MEDLINE (EBSCO), Web of Science, and Scopus. The databases were searched between January 2010 and January 2022. The inclusion criteria were pregnant women diagnosed with GDM, use of telemedicine for monitoring and management, and vulnerable or disadvantaged patients. We used terms related to mobile apps and telemedicine: GDM, vulnerable populations, periphery, cultural appropriateness, and digital health literacy. Studies were screened and selected independently by 2 authors. We extracted the study data on a Microsoft Excel charting table and categorized them into final themes. The results were categorized according to the cultural and digital health literacy features presented.

Results: We identified 17 studies that reported on 12 telemedicine and mHealth app interventions. We assessed the studies in three domains: cultural appropriateness, digital health literacy, and maternal and infant outcomes. In the literature, we found that existing digital technologies may improve glycemic control and diabetes self-management. However, there is a lack of assessment of cultural and digital health literacy appropriateness for pregnant women diagnosed with GDM. Considerations in app design regarding cultural appropriateness were found in only 12% (2/17) of the studies, and only 25% (3/12) of the interventions scored ≥3 out of 5 in our assessment of digital health literacy.

Conclusions: mHealth and telemedicine can be an effective platform to improve the clinical management of women with GDM. Although studies published on the use of mHealth and telemedicine systems exist, there is a limited body of knowledge on the digital health literacy and cultural appropriateness of the systems designed for women diagnosed with GDM. In addition, as our study was restricted to the English language, relevant studies may have been excluded. Further research is needed to evaluate, design, and implement better tailored apps regarding cultural and digital literacy appropriateness for enhancing pregnant women's self-management as well as the effectiveness of these apps in improving maternal and infant health outcomes.

Keywords: culture; gestational diabetes mellitus; health literacy; mHealth; maternal health; mobile apps; mobile health; mobile phone; pregnancy outcome; telemedicine; vulnerable populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gestational diabetes. International Diabetes Federation. 2020. Jan 7, [2022-06-30]. https://www.idf.org/our-activities/care-prevention/gdm .
    1. Kc K, Shakya S, Zhang H. Gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia: a literature review. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66 Suppl 2:14–20. doi: 10.1159/000371628. https://www.karger.com?DOI=10.1159/000371628 000371628 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGuane JT, Grlj L, Peek MJ. Obesity, gestational diabetes and macrosomia are associated with increasing rates of early-term induction of labour at The Canberra Hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr 02;59(2):215–20. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12820. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saravanan P, Magee LA, Banerjee A, Coleman MA, Von Dadelszen P, Denison F, Farmer A, Finer S, Fox-Rushby J, Holt R, Lindsay RS, MacKillop L, Maresh M, McAuliffe FM, McCance D, McCarthy FP, Meek CL, Murphy HR, Myers J, Pasupathy D, Poston L, Reynolds RM, Saravanan P, Scott E, Sukumar N, Tan BK, Thangaratinam S, Webster L, White SL, Williamson C. Gestational diabetes: opportunities for improving maternal and child health. lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Sep;8(9):793–800. doi: 10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30161-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buhary B, Almohareb O, Aljohani N, Alzahrani S, Elkaissi S, Sherbeeni S, Almaghamsi A, Almalki M. Glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20(4):481–90. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.183478. http://www.ijem.in/article.asp?issn=2230-8210;year=2016;volume=20;issue=... IJEM-20-481 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types