Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;43(10):e1174-e1179.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003719. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

Use of a Novel Clinical Decision-Making Tool in Vestibular Schwannoma Treatment

Olivia A La Monte, Omid Moshtaghi  1 , Edison Tang  2 , Eric Y Du  1 , Austin R Swisher  1 , Peter R Dixon  1 , Shamim Nemati  2 , Hamid R Djalilian  3 , Marc S Schwartz  4 , Rick A Friedman  1
Affiliations
Free article

Use of a Novel Clinical Decision-Making Tool in Vestibular Schwannoma Treatment

Olivia A La Monte et al. Otol Neurotol. .
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To determine the usefulness of a personalized tool and its effect on the decision-making process for those with vestibular schwannoma (VS).

Study design: Prospective study.

Setting: Single institution, academic tertiary care lateral skull base surgery program.

Patients: Patients diagnosed with VS.

Interventions: A comprehensive clinical decision support (CDS) tool was constructed from a previously published retrospective patient-reported data obtained from members of the Acoustic Neuroma Association from January to March 2017. Demographic, tumor, and treatment modality data, including associated side effects, were collected for 775 patients and integrated in an interactive and personalized web-based tool.

Main outcome measures: Pre- and posttool questionnaires assessing the process of deciding treatment for VS using a decisional conflict scale (DCS) and satisfaction with decision (SWD) scale were compared.

Results: A pilot study of 33 patients evaluated at a single institution tertiary care center with mean ± SD age of 63.9 ± 13.5 years and with average tumor size of 7.11 ± 4.75 mm were surveyed. CDS implementation resulted in a mean ± SD total DCS score decrease from 43.6 ± 15.5 to 37.6 ± 16.4 ( p < 0.01) and total SWD score increase from 82.8 ± 16.1 to 86.2 ± 14.4 ( p = 0.04), indicating a significant decrease in decisional conflict and increase in satisfaction.

Conclusions: Implementing a decision-making tool after diagnosis of VS reduced decisional conflict and improved satisfaction with decision. Patients considered the tool to be an aid to their medical knowledge, further improving their comfort and understanding of their treatment options. These findings provide a basis for developing predictive tools that will assist patients in making informed medical decisions in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Fisher JL, Pettersson D, Palmisano S, et al. Loud noise exposure and acoustic neuroma. Am J Epidemiol 2014;180:58–67.
    1. Lin D, Hegarty JL, Fischbein NJ, Jackler RK. The prevalence of incidental acoustic neuroma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:241–4.
    1. Zanoletti E, Faccioli C, Martini A. Surgical treatment of acoustic neuroma: outcomes and indications. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016;21:395–8.
    1. Sim I, Gorman P, Greenes RA, et al. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001;8:527–34.
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223–38.