Effective refractive error coverage in adults aged 50 years and older: estimates from population-based surveys in 61 countries
- PMID: 36240807
- DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00433-8
Effective refractive error coverage in adults aged 50 years and older: estimates from population-based surveys in 61 countries
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Glob Health 2022; published online Oct 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00433-8.Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Dec;10(12):e1714. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00469-7. Epub 2022 Nov 1. Lancet Glob Health. 2022. PMID: 36332655 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: In 2021, WHO Member States endorsed a global target of a 40-percentage-point increase in effective refractive error coverage (eREC; with a 6/12 visual acuity threshold) by 2030. This study models global and regional estimates of eREC as a baseline for the WHO initiative.
Methods: The Vision Loss Expert Group analysed data from 565 448 participants of 169 population-based eye surveys conducted since 2000 to calculate eREC (met need/[met need + undermet need + unmet need]). A binary logistic regression model was used to estimate eREC by Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study super region among adults aged 50 years and older.
Findings: In 2021, distance eREC was 79·1% (95% CI 72·4-85·0) in the high-income super region; 62·1% (54·7-68·8) in north Africa and Middle East; 49·5% (45·0-54·0) in central Europe, eastern Europe, and central Asia; 40·0% (31·7-48·2) in southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania; 34·5% (29·4-40·0) in Latin America and the Caribbean; 9·0% (6·5-12·0) in south Asia; and 5·7% (3·1-9·0) in sub-Saharan Africa. eREC was higher in men and reduced with increasing age. Global distance eREC increased from 2000 to 2021 by 19·0%. Global near vision eREC for 2021 was 20·5% (95% CI 17·8-24·4).
Interpretation: Over the past 20 years, distance eREC has increased in each super region yet the WHO target will require substantial improvements in quantity and quality of refractive services in particular for near vision impairment.
Funding: WHO, Sightsavers, The Fred Hollows Foundation, Fondation Thea, Brien Holden Vision Institute, Lions Clubs International Foundation.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests JR reports university position funding by Buchanan Charitable Foundation, New Zealand. KSN reports employment by OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation. JMF reports research grants from Lions SightFirst & Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil. Tecnológico, Brazil. RV reports the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study research grant from the National Eye Institute, where he participates on a Data Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous