Identifying influential sires and distinct clusters of selection candidates based on genomic relationships to reduce inbreeding in the US Holstein
- PMID: 36241432
- DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22143
Identifying influential sires and distinct clusters of selection candidates based on genomic relationships to reduce inbreeding in the US Holstein
Abstract
High relatedness in the US Holstein breed can be attributed to the increased rate of inbreeding that resulted from strong selection and the extensive use of a few bulls via reproductive biotechnology. The objectives of this study were to determine whether clustering could separate selected candidates into genetically different groups and whether such clustering could reduce the expected inbreeding of the next generation. A genomic relationship matrix composed of 1,145 sires with the most registered progeny in the breed born after 1985 was used for principal component analysis and k-means clustering. The 5 clusters reduced the variance by 25% and contained 171 (C1), 252 (C2), 200 (C3), 244 (C4), and 278 (C5) animals, respectively. The 2 most predominant families were C1 and C2, while C4 contained the most international animals. On average, C1 and C5 contained older animals; the average birth year per cluster was 1988 (C1), 1996 (C2 and C3), 1999 (C4), and 1990 (C5). Increasing to 10 clusters allowed the separation of the predominant sons. Statistically significant differences were observed for indices (net merit index, cheese merit index, and fluid merit index), daughter pregnancy rate, and production traits (milk, fat, and protein), with older clusters having lower merit for production but higher for reproduction. K-means clustering was also used for 20,099 animals considered as selection candidates. Based on the reduction in variance achieved by clustering, 5 to 7 clusters were appropriate. The number of animals in each cluster was 3,577 (C1), 3,073 (C2), 3,302 (C3), 5,931 (C4), and 4,216 (C5). The expected inbreeding from within or across cluster mating was calculated using the complete pedigree, assuming the mean inbreeding of animals born in the same year when parents are unknown. Generally, inbreeding was highest within cluster mating and lowest across cluster mating. Even when 10 clusters were used, one cluster always gave low inbreeding in all scenarios. This suggests that this cluster contains animals that differ from all other groups but still contains enough diversity within itself. Based on lower across cluster inbreeding, up to 7 clusters were appropriate. Statistically significant differences in genomic estimated breeding values were found between clusters. The rankings of clusters for different traits were mostly the same except for reproduction and fat. Results show that diversity within the population exists and clustering of selection candidates can reduce the expected inbreeding of the next generations.
Keywords: genetic diversity; k-means; principal component analysis.
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Similar articles
-
Nonparallel genome changes within subpopulations over time contributed to genetic diversity within the US Holstein population.J Dairy Sci. 2023 Apr;106(4):2551-2572. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-21914. Epub 2023 Feb 14. J Dairy Sci. 2023. PMID: 36797192
-
Assessment of genetic diversity, inbreeding, and collection completeness of Jersey bulls in the US National Animal Germplasm Program.J Dairy Sci. 2024 Dec;107(12):11283-11300. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25032. Epub 2024 Sep 28. J Dairy Sci. 2024. PMID: 39343205
-
A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.J Dairy Sci. 2019 Sep;102(9):8210-8220. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16283. Epub 2019 Jun 20. J Dairy Sci. 2019. PMID: 31229287
-
Major advances in genetic evaluation techniques.J Dairy Sci. 2006 Apr;89(4):1337-48. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72201-9. J Dairy Sci. 2006. PMID: 16537965 Review.
-
Invited review: Inbreeding in the genomics era: Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and management of genomic variability.J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6009-6024. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12787. Epub 2017 Jun 7. J Dairy Sci. 2017. PMID: 28601448 Review.
Cited by
-
randPedPCA: rapid approximation of principal components from large pedigrees.Genet Sel Evol. 2025 Aug 28;57(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00994-y. Genet Sel Evol. 2025. PMID: 40877802 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous