Diagnosing Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Exhaled Breath Profiling Using an Electronic Nose: A Multicenter Validation Study
- PMID: 36243060
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.042
Diagnosing Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Exhaled Breath Profiling Using an Electronic Nose: A Multicenter Validation Study
Abstract
Background: Despite the potential of exhaled breath analysis of volatile organic compounds to diagnose lung cancer, clinical implementation has not been realized, partly due to the lack of validation studies.
Research question: This study addressed two questions. First, can we simultaneously train and validate a prediction model to distinguish patients with non-small cell lung cancer from non-lung cancer subjects based on exhaled breath patterns? Second, does addition of clinical variables to exhaled breath data improve the diagnosis of lung cancer?
Study design and methods: In this multicenter study, subjects with non-small cell lung cancer and control subjects performed 5 min of tidal breathing through the aeoNose, a handheld electronic nose device. A training cohort was used for developing a prediction model based on breath data, and a blinded cohort was used for validation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, including breath data and clinical variables, in which the formula and cutoff value for the probability of lung cancer were applied to the validation data.
Results: A total of 376 subjects formed the training set, and 199 subjects formed the validation set. The full training model (including exhaled breath data and clinical parameters from the training set) were combined in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, maintaining a cut off of 16% probability of lung cancer, resulting in a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 51%, and a negative predictive value of 94%; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.87. Performance of the prediction model on the validation cohort showed corresponding results with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 49%, a negative predictive value of 94%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.86.
Interpretation: Combining exhaled breath data and clinical variables in a multicenter, multi-device validation study can adequately distinguish patients with lung cancer from subjects without lung cancer in a noninvasive manner. This study paves the way to implement exhaled breath analysis in the daily practice of diagnosing lung cancer.
Clinical trial registration: The Netherlands Trial Register; No.: NL7025; URL: https://trialregister.nl/trial/7025.
Keywords: electronic nose; exhaled breath; lung cancer; validation.
Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
It Doesn't Smell Like Cancer to Me: The Promise of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Diagnosis.Chest. 2023 Mar;163(3):479-480. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.026. Chest. 2023. PMID: 36894259 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Exhaled-breath Testing for Prostate Cancer Based on Volatile Organic Compound Profiling Using an Electronic Nose Device (Aeonose™): A Preliminary Report.Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Nov 15;6(6):1220-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Eur Urol Focus. 2020. PMID: 30482583
-
Multi-centre prospective study on diagnosing subtypes of lung cancer by exhaled-breath analysis.Lung Cancer. 2018 Nov;125:223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Sep 29. Lung Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30429025
-
Prediction of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer by electronic nose analysis of exhaled breath.Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1660-1666. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz279. Ann Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31529107
-
Inconsistencies in predictive models based on exhaled volatile organic compounds for distinguishing between benign pulmonary nodules and lung cancer: a systematic review.BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Nov 2;24(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03374-2. BMC Pulm Med. 2024. PMID: 39488679 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic Nose Analysis of Exhaled Breath Volatiles to Identify Lung Cancer Cases: A Systematic Review.J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2020 Jan-Feb;31(1):71-79. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000146. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2020. PMID: 31860595
Cited by
-
Innovative Approaches to Early Detection of Cancer-Transforming Screening for Breast, Lung, and Hard-to-Screen Cancers.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;17(11):1867. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111867. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40507348 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent Advances in Wearable Healthcare Devices: From Material to Application.Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Apr 6;11(4):358. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040358. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38671780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The electronic nose in lung cancer diagnostics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ERJ Open Res. 2025 May 19;11(3):00723-2024. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00723-2024. eCollection 2025 May. ERJ Open Res. 2025. PMID: 40391063 Free PMC article.
-
Research Communication: Breath Testing for Colorectal Cancer Detection in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Multicentre Prospective Cross-Sectional Study With External Validation.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jul;62(2):208-213. doi: 10.1111/apt.70207. Epub 2025 Jun 3. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025. PMID: 40459533 Free PMC article.
-
The human volatilome meets cancer diagnostics: past, present, and future of noninvasive applications.Metabolomics. 2024 Oct 7;20(5):113. doi: 10.1007/s11306-024-02180-5. Metabolomics. 2024. PMID: 39375265 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical