Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 16;79(11):551.
doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04591-w.

Fluid shear stress promotes periodontal ligament cells proliferation via p38-AMOT-YAP

Affiliations

Fluid shear stress promotes periodontal ligament cells proliferation via p38-AMOT-YAP

Qiusheng Shi et al. Cell Mol Life Sci. .

Abstract

Periodontal ligament (PDL) cells are a promising tool for periodontal regeneration therapy. Achieving a sufficient number of PDL cells is essential to PDL regeneration. In our study, appropriate flow shear stress (FSS, 1-6 dyn/cm2) promotes the proliferation of PDL cells. FSS remodels cytoskeleton and focal adhesion in a duration-dependent manner. FSS induces PDL cells to form the actin cap within 10 min, flattens the nuclei, and increases the nuclear pore size, which promotes nuclear translocation of Yes-associated protein (YAP). FSS activates p38, which plays a dual function in YAP regulation. p38 regulates the phosphorylation of Akt and cofilin, as well as induced F-actin polymerization to induce YAP activity. In addition, p38 inhibits pLATS and consecutively regulates angiomotin (AMOT) and YAP phosphorylation. AMOT competitively binds to F-actin and YAP to participate in FSS-mediated YAP nuclear translocation and cell proliferation. Taken collectively, our results provide mechanistic insights into the role of p38-AMOT-YAP in FSS-mediated PDL cells proliferation and indicate potential applications in dental regenerative medicine.

Keywords: Biomechanics; LINC; Mechanotransduction; Nuclear changes; Nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
FSS promoted proliferation, rearranged the cytoskeleton, and changed the nuclear shape of PDL cells. A PDL Cells were subjected to 1 dyn/cm2, 3 dyn/cm2, 6 dyn/cm2, and 9 dyn/cm2 of FSS for 4 h. Cells cultured under static conditions served as the control. EdU-positive (green) cells and nuclei (blue) were imaged. Scale bars = 50 μm. B Quantification of the percentage of EdU-positive cells in each group. (n = 29, 29, 31, 30, 30 roi, respectively). C PDL cells were subjected to FSS for 4 h and cultured for two passages (P4 and P5). Cell viability was quantified and is represented as mean ± s.d. (n ≥ 3). D PDL cells subjected to FSS at 6 dyn/cm2 for 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, or 4 h were immunostained with rhodamine phalloidin (F-actin, red), FAK (green), and DAPI (blue). Quantification of cell density of F-actin (E) (n = 135, 135, 134, 135, 134, 134, 135 roi, respectively), cell projected areas (F) (n = 38, 35, 35, 44, 52, 45, 40 roi, respectively), cell shape index (CSI = 4π x area/perimeter2) (G) (n = 38, 26, 29, 31, 28, 26, 40 roi, respectively) in static or sheared PDL cells. H Quantification of FAK length (n = 47, 50, 50, 48, 50, 50 50 roi, respectively) in static or sheared PDL cells examined in (D). I PDL cells under static conditions or subjected to FSS at 6 dyn/cm2 for 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, or 4 h. Nuclear morphology of DAPI-stained nuclei (blue) indicates 3D nuclear shape, where maximum intensity projection onto the XY-plane was performed using upper hemispheres of the 3D reconstructed nuclei. The cross-sectional side view was captured along the XZ-plane and YZ-plane crossing the center of the nucleus. Scale bars = 3 μm. Nuclear thickness (J) and the projected nuclear area (K) onto the XY-plane was shown. The volume of the 3D reconstructed nuclei (L). (n = 29 roi per condition). M Actin cap was reorganized by FSS. Representative images of F-actin organization in the apical region of the nucleus were given. Scale bars = 10 μm. Yellow boxes indicate the regions that were shown as a magnified view. Scale bars = 2 μm. 3D rendering illustrate indicated the presence of the perinuclear actin cap. Scale bars = 2 μm. N Quantification of total fluorescence intensity of actin cap in static or sheared PDL cells (n = 39 roi per condition). O Total fluorescence intensity of actin cap versus nuclear thickness for the conditions in (N) and (J). The dashed line shows a linear fit to the data (R2, squared correlation coefficient). P TEM images of nuclear pores of PDL cells under static conditions or subjected to FSS for 5 min or 10 min. Yellow arrows indicated nuclear pores. Scale bars = 500 nm. Q Quantification of Nuclear pore size (n = 18 roi per condition nuclear pores from ≥ 10 cells per condition) in static or sheared PDL cells examined in (P). Bar represents mean ± s.d. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01; NS not significant
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
YAP involved in FSS-induced proliferation in PDL cells. A PDL cells under static conditions or after FSS at 6 dyn/cm2 for 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, or 4 h were fixed and immunostained with anti-YAP (green) antibody together with DAPI (blue). Yellow arrowheads of color maps showing YAP intensity for the conditions measured, respectively. Scale bars = 50 μm. B Quantification of nuclear relative to cytoplasmic fluorescent intensity of YAP in static or FSS. (n = 55 roi per condition). C Nuc/Cyt YAP ratio versus nuclear thickness for the conditions in (B) and Fig. 1J. The dashed line shows a linear fit to the data (R2, squared correlation coefficient). D Phosphorylated YAP on Ser127 expression on static or FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min, 10 min) in PDL cells. pYAP/total YAP intensity ratio is shown on lower panel (n ≥ 3). E and F qPCR of CTGF (E) and ANKRD1 (F) gene expression under static conditions or FSS (n ≥ 3). G PDL Cells transfected with control siRNA or YAP siRNAs and subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 4 h). Representative image of EdU-positive cells in each group was given. Scale bars = 50 μm. H Quantification of the percentage of EdU-positive cells in each group was shown. (n = 41 roi per condition). I pLATS1 (Thr1079) expression of static or sheared (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min, 10 min) were detected by Western blotting and pLATS1/total LATS1 intensity were presented at lower panel (n ≥ 3). PDL Cells transfected with control siRNA or LATS1/2 siRNAs were subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min) and YAP (green) localization (J), quantification of nuclear relative to cytoplasmic fluorescent intensity (K) (n = 65 roi per condition), CTGF (L), ANKRD1 (M) gene expression (n ≥ 3), pYAP expression (N) (n ≥ 3) and (O, P) EdU results (n = 42 roi per condition) were presented. Bar represents mean ± s.d. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01; NS not significant
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
p38 regulated FSS-induced cell proliferation by regulating LATS and YAP in PDL cells. AC 6 dyn/cm2 of FSS was loaded on PDL cells as the duration shown in figures. pJNK/JNK, p-p38/p38, pERK1/2/ERK expressions were detected by Western blotting. (n ≥ 3). DK PDL cells preincubated with DMSO, JNK pathway inhibitor SP600125 (SP, 10 μm, 2 h), p38 pathway inhibitor SB203580 (SB, 10 μm, 2 h), or ERK pathway inhibitor PD98059 (PD, 10 μm, 2 h) and subjected to FSS. YAP localization (green) (D), quantification of nuclear relative to cytoplasmic fluorescent intensity of YAP (E) (n = 64 roi per condition), pYAP(Ser127) (n ≥ 3) (F), CTGF (G), ANKRD1 (H), mRNA expression (n ≥ 3) and EdU results (n = 113, 107, 111, 109, 108 roi, respectively) (I, J), and pLATS1 (Thr1079) (n ≥ 3) (K). Bar represents mean ± s.d. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01; NS not significant
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cytoskeleton and LINC involve in FSS-induced YAP localization in PDL cells. (A) PDL cells preincubated with DMSO, actin inhibitor cytochalasin D (cyto D, 1 μm, 1 h), myosin II inhibitor Blebbistatin (Bleb, 50 μm, 2 h), Rho kinases (ROCK) inhibitor Y27632 (Y27632, 10 μm, 2 h), or actin stabilizer Jasplakinolide (Jasp, 50 nM, 2 h) were under static or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min) and were immunostained with anti-YAP (green) antibody and rhodamine phalloidin (red). Scale bars = 50 μm. B Quantification of nuclear relative to cytoplasmic fluorescent intensity of YAP in static or sheared PDL cells examined in (A) (n = 65, 65, 65, 65, 65, 64 roi, respectively). CF Nuclear morphology changed by FSS and cytoskeleton inhibitors. Scale bars = 3 μm. Quantification of nuclear thickness (D), nuclear area (E), and volume (F) (n = 34 roi per condition). GO PDL Cells transfected with control siRNA or Nesprin1 siRNAs were under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min). Immunostained YAP (green) (G), quantification of nuclear fluorescence intensity of YAP relative to that of cytoplasm (H) (n = 70 roi per condition), quantification of F-actin fluorescence intensity (I) (n = 45 roi per condition), F-actin organization in the apical region of the nucleus and quantification of total fluorescence intensity of actin cap (J and K) (n = 36 roi per condition), nuclear morphology (L), nuclear thickness (M), nuclear area (N) and volume (O) (n = 34 roi per condition). Bar represents mean ± s.d. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01; NS not significant
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
p38 affected Akt/cofilin and LATS to regulate FSS-induced F-actin polymerization in PDL cells. A and B 6 dyn/cm2 of FSS loaded on PDL cells for 5 min, 10 min, and 30 min. pAkt, Akt (A), pcofilin and cofilin (B) protein expressions were detected by Western blotting (n ≥ 3). CG PDL cells transfected with control siRNA or cofilin siRNAs and under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min). Immunostaining YAP (green) (C), quantification of nuclear relative to cytoplasmic fluorescent intensity of YAP (D) (n = 65 roi per condition), CTGF (E), ANKRD1 (F), mRNA expression (n ≥ 3), F-actin intensity (G) (n = 41 roi per condition). H pcofilin/cofilin expressions were detected when cells were incubated with DMSO or Akt inhibitor MK-2206 (2.5 μm, 24 h) under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min) (n ≥ 3). IL PDL cells preincubated with DMSO or p38 pathway inhibitor SB203580 (10 μm, 2 h) and under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min). pAkt (I), pcofilin (J) (n ≥ 3), and F-actin intensity (K and L) (n = 109,109,106 roi, respectively). M pLATS1/LATS1 expressions were detected when cells were incubated with DMSO or Akt inhibitor MK-2206 (2.5 μm, 24 h) under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min) (n ≥ 3). NU PDL cells transfected with control siRNA or LATS1/2 siRNAs and under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min). F-actin intensity (N and O) (n = 101,102, 103,104 roi, respectively), actin cap (P and Q) (n = 36 roi per condition), nuclear morphology (R), quantification of nuclear thickness (S), nuclear area (T), and volume (U) (n = 33 roi per condition). Bar represents mean ± s.d. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01; NS not significant
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Angiomotin competitively bond with YAP and F-actin and involved in FSS-induced proliferation in PDL cells. PDL cells under static or exposed to 6 dyn/cm2 of FSS for 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, or 4 h. Immunostaining of AMOT (green) (A) and quantification of nuclear relative to cytoplasmic fluorescent intensity of AMOT (B) (n = 63 roi per condition), C Nuc/Cyt ratio of YAP and AMOT by FSS (R2, squared correlation coefficient). D Nuc/Cyt AMOT ratio versus nuclear thickness. E FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min, 10 min) inhibited pAMOT (Ser175) expression (n ≥ 3). FK PDL cells transfected with control siRNA or AMOT siRNAs and subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min or 4 h). YAP nuclear localization (F and G) (n = 68 roi per condition), CTGF (H), ANKRD1 (I), expression and EdU results (J, K) (n = 41, 41, 42, 41 roi, respectively). LO PDL cells were kept under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min,10 min) (L). PDL cells transfected with control siRNA or YAP siRNAs were kept under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min) (M). PDL cells were preincubated with DMSO, myosin II inhibitor Blebbistatin (Bleb, 50 μm, 2 h) (N), or actin stabilizer Jasplakinolide (Jasp, 50 nM, 2 h) (O) and were kept under static conditions or subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min). Lysates of PDL cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-AMOT antibody. Coprecipitated endogenous YAP and F-actin were detected by immunoblotting with anti-YAP and anti-F-actin antibody. YAP and F-actin immunoprecipitated with anti-AMOT antibody (IP: AMOT Ab) in static or sheared PDL cells were analyzed. The relative intensity was calculated by the intensity of the band of immunoprecipitated YAP or F-actin by anti-AMOT antibody in the static or sheared PDL cells. Bar represents mean ± s.d. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01; NS not significant
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
YAP and LATS regulated FSS-induced AMOT phosphorylation and localization. PDL cells transfected with control siRNA or YAP siRNAs (A, B) or LATS1/2 siRNAs (C, D) and subjected to FSS (6 dyn/cm2, 5 min). Immunostaining of AMOT and quantification of nuclear relative to cytoplasmic fluorescent intensity of AMOT (B, n = 43 roi per condition) (D, n = 63 roi per condition). E When LATS1/2 were knocked down, FSS-depressed pAMOT (Ser175) expression was further declined (n ≥ 3). F When AMOT was knocked down, FSS-depressed pLATS1 expression was further decreased (n ≥ 3). G A schematic representation of how FSS regulated p38 and further affected YAP nuclear translocation to promoted proliferation in PDL cells. Bar represents mean ± s.d. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01; NS not significant

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW (2005) Periodontal diseases. Lancet 366:1809–1820. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67728-8 - PubMed
    1. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN (2017) Periodontal diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 22:17038–17049. 10.1038/nrdp.2017.38 - PubMed
    1. Chen FM, Sun HH, Lu H, Yu Q (2012) Stem cell-delivery therapeutics for periodontal tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 33:6320–6344. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.048 - PubMed
    1. Iwata T, Yamato M, Zhang Z et al (2010) Validation of human periodontal ligament-derived cells as a reliable source for cytotherapeutic use. J Clin Periodontol 37:1088–1099. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01597.x - PubMed
    1. Nakdilok K, Langsa-ard S, Krisanaprakornkit S et al (2020) Enhancement of human periodontal ligament by preapplication of orthodontic loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 157:186–193. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.019 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources