Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;9(11):894-906.
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00307-8.

Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction following COVID-19 infection: evidence from 11 UK longitudinal population studies

Affiliations

Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction following COVID-19 infection: evidence from 11 UK longitudinal population studies

Ellen J Thompson et al. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Evidence on associations between COVID-19 illness and mental health is mixed. We aimed to examine whether COVID-19 is associated with deterioration in mental health while considering pre-pandemic mental health, time since infection, subgroup differences, and confirmation of infection via self-reported test and serology data.

Methods: We obtained data from 11 UK longitudinal studies with repeated measures of mental health (psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction; mental health scales were standardised within each study across time) and COVID-19 status between April, 2020, and April, 2021. We included participants with information available on at least one mental health outcome measure and self-reported COVID-19 status (suspected or test-confirmed) during the pandemic, and a subset with serology-confirmed COVID-19. Furthermore, only participants who had available data on a minimum set of covariates, including age, sex, and pre-pandemic mental health were included. We investigated associations between having ever had COVID-19 and mental health outcomes using generalised estimating equations. We examined whether associations varied by age, sex, ethnicity, education, and pre-pandemic mental health, whether the strength of the association varied according to time since infection, and whether associations differed between self-reported versus confirmed (by test or serology) infection.

Findings: Between 21 Dec, 2021, and July 11, 2022, we analysed data from 54 442 participants (ranging from a minimum age of 16 years in one study to a maximum category of 90 years and older in another; including 33 200 [61·0%] women and 21 242 [39·0%] men) from 11 longitudinal UK studies. Of 40 819 participants with available ethnicity data, 36 802 (90·2%) were White. Pooled estimates of standardised differences in outcomes suggested associations between COVID-19 and subsequent psychological distress (0·10 [95% CI 0·06 to 0·13], I2=42·8%), depression (0·08 [0·05 to 0·10], I2=20·8%), anxiety (0·08 [0·05 to 0·10], I2=0·0%), and lower life satisfaction (-0·06 [-0·08 to -0·04], I2=29·2%). We found no evidence of interactions between COVID-19 and sex, education, ethnicity, or pre-pandemic mental health. Associations did not vary substantially between time since infection of less than 4 weeks, 4-12 weeks, and more than 12 weeks, and were present in all age groups, with some evidence of stronger effects in those aged 50 years and older. Participants who self-reported COVID-19 but had negative serology had worse mental health outcomes for all measures than those without COVID-19 based on serology and self-report. Participants who had positive serology but did not self-report COVID-19 did not show association with mental health outcomes.

Interpretation: Self-reporting COVID-19 was longitudinally associated with deterioration in mental health and life satisfaction. Our findings emphasise the need for greater post-infection mental health service provision, given the substantial prevalence of COVID-19 in the UK and worldwide.

Funding: UK Medical Research Council and UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests SVK is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies subgroup on ethnicity and COVID-19 and is co-chair of the Scottish Government's Ethnicity Reference Group on COVID-19. NC serves on a data safety monitoring board for trials sponsored by AstraZeneca. CJS is an academic lead on KCL Zoe Global COVID symptoms study. KT has been a paid consultant for the CHDI Foundation (member of Statistical Advisory Group) and is a member of the steering group for Living With COVID Recovery study at UCL (unpaid). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Associations between COVID-19 and continuous (A) and binary (B) mental health outcomes Estimates from longitudinal generalised estimating equation models with ever-COVID-19 exposure and mental health outcomes for each included study and the overall pooled estimate. ALSPAC-G0=the parents of the ALSPAC-G1 birth cohort. ALSPAC-G1=Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. BCS70= the 1970 British Cohort Study. ELSA=the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. GS=Generation Scotland: The Scottish Family Health Study. MCS=Millennium Cohort Study. NCDS=the National Child Development Study. NS=Next Steps, formerly known as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England. NSHD=the National Survey of Health and Development. RR=risk ratio. TwinsUK=the UK Adult Twin Registry. USoc/UKHLS=Understanding Society/The UK Household Longitudinal Study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between time since COVID-19 infection and continuous mental health outcomes Data for each included study and the overall pooled estimate. ALSPAC-G0=the parents of the ALSPAC-G1 birth cohort. ALSPAC-G1=Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. BCS70= the 1970 British Cohort Study. NCDS=the National Child Development Study. NS=Next Steps, formerly known as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England. TwinsUK=the UK Adult Twin Registry.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Suspected versus test-confirmed COVID-19 infection and mental health outcomes Data for each included study and the overall pooled estimate. ALSPAC-G0=the parents of the ALSPAC-G1 birth cohort. ALSPAC-G1=Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. BCS70= the 1970 British Cohort Study. ELSA=the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. GS=Generation Scotland: The Scottish Family Health Study. MCS=Millennium Cohort Study. NCDS=the National Child Development Study. NS=Next Steps, formerly known as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England. NSHD=the National Survey of Health and Development. TwinsUK=the UK Adult Twin Registry. USoc/UKHLS=Understanding Society/The UK Household Longitudinal Study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Suspected versus serology-confirmed COVID-19 infection and mental health outcomes Data for each included study and the overall pooled estimate. ALSPAC-G0=the parents of the BCS70= the 1970 British Cohort Study. MCS=Millennium Cohort Study. NCDS=the National Child Development Study. NS=Next Steps, formerly known as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England. NSHD=the National Survey of Health and Development. TwinsUK=the UK Adult Twin Registry. USoc/UKHLS=Understanding Society/The UK Household Longitudinal Study.

References

    1. Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D, et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:611–627. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santomauro DF, Mantilla Herrera AM, Shadid J, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;398:1700–1712. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourmistrova NW, Solomon T, Braude P, Strawbridge R, Carter B. Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2022;299:118–125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schou TM, Joca S, Wegener G, Bay-Richter C. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19—a systematic review. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;97:328–348. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rogers JP, Watson CJ, Badenoch J, et al. Neurology and neuropsychiatry of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the early literature reveals frequent CNS manifestations and key emerging narratives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92:932–941. - PubMed

Publication types