Patient-Reported Outcomes in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
- PMID: 36244689
- PMCID: PMC11012236
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2022.04.005
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
Abstract
The functional outcome, quality of life, and patient feedback related to a chosen treatment approach in skull base surgery have become a subject of interest and focused research in recent years. The current advances in endoscopic optical imaging technology and surgical precision have radically lowered the perioperative morbidity associated with skull base surgery. This has pushed toward a higher focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It is now critical to ensure that the offered treatment plan and approach align with the patient's preferences and expectations, in addition to the surgeon's best clinical judgment and experience. PROs represent a view that reflects the patient's own thoughts and perspective on their condition and the management options, without input or interpretations from the surgeon. Having PRO data enables patients the opportunity to learn from the experiences and perspectives of other patients. This input empowers the patient to become an active participant in the decision-making process at different stages of their care. An in-depth PRO evaluation requires specific validated tools and scoring systems, namely the patient-reported outcomes measures (PROM) tools. In this review, we discuss the currently available skull-base-related PROs, the assessment tools used to capture them, and the future trends of this important topic that is in its infancy.
Keywords: Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS); Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); Patient-reported outcomes (PROs); Pituitary surgery.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Factors Associated With Internal Carotid Injury in Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr 1;146(4):364-372. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4864. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 32105301 Free PMC article.
-
Letter to editor: Exploring the influence of nasal morbidity on quality of life following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 95 patients.Neurosurg Rev. 2024 May 4;47(1):204. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02445-6. Neurosurg Rev. 2024. PMID: 38702573
-
Indications and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas.World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6 Suppl):S81-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.030. World Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 25496640 Review.
-
Comprehensive management of the paranasal sinuses in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6 Suppl):S54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.027. World Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 25496636 Review.
-
[Shifting paradigm in skull base surgery: Roots, current state of the art and future trends of endonasal endoscopic approaches].Rev Neurol (Paris). 2012 Feb;168(2):121-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Nov 21. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2012. PMID: 22104065 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Clinical application of reserved gastric tube in neuroendoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumor.World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 24;15(3):411-418. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i3.411. World J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38576596 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous