Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36245071
- PMCID: PMC9947369
- DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-045
Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or malignant lesions located in caudate lobe of liver. Pooled outcome data were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 196 patients from 12 studies were included. Mean operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 225 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 181-269 minutes), 134 mL (95% CI, 85-184 mL), and 7 days (95% CI, 5-9 days), respectively. The pooled risk of need for intraoperative transfusion was 2% (95% CI, 0%-5%). It was 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) for conversion to open surgery, 6% (95% CI, 0%-19%) for need for intra-abdominal drain, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative mortality, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary leakage, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for intra-abdominal abscess, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary stenosis, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative bleeding, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for pancreatic fistula, 2% (95% CI, 1%-5%) for pulmonary complications, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for paralytic ileus, and 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for need for reoperation. Although the available evidence is limited, the findings of the current study might be utilized for hypothesis synthesis in future studies. They can be used to inform surgeons and patients about estimated risks of perioperative complications until a higher level of evidence is available.
Keywords: Caudate lobe; Hepatectomy; Laparoscopy; Liver resection.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures



References
-
- Koh YX, Lee SY, Chiow AKH, Kam JH, Goh BKP, Chan CY. Laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: navigating the technical challenge. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:39. doi: 10.21037/ales.2017.03.04. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources