Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;14(9):3376-3385.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-472.

Survival prognostic factors in unresectable/advanced primary thoracic sarcomas

Affiliations

Survival prognostic factors in unresectable/advanced primary thoracic sarcomas

Jerónimo R Rodriguez-Cid et al. J Thorac Dis. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Primary thoracic sarcomas (PTS) including primary pulmonary and chest wall sarcomas (CWS), are aggressive lung malignancies with limited information specially in an advanced/unresectable setting. Unfortunately, prognostic factors for these malignancies are not well identified.

Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients diagnosed with unresectable/advanced soft tissue PTS from a third level reference institute. Univariate and multivariate analysis performed via Cox-regression model. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis via Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 157 patients were identified, 55.4% female, mean age 51.8 years (range, 18-90 years), 19.1% tobacco exposure and 10.8% asbestos exposure. The most common performance status was Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1 (38.9%), most common clinical presentation cough (58.4%) and thoracic pain (55.4%). Undifferentiated sarcoma (37.6%) followed by synovial sarcoma (34.4%) were the most common histologies. Most patients received five chemotherapeutic cycles (37.6%), 57.3% of patients obtained a partial response and 61.1% an overall response rate (ORR). Median PFS was 9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.717-9.283 months]. The multivariable analysis identified ECOG ≥2, a poorer response to chemotherapy (less number of chemotherapy cycles) and an increase Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) to be associated with a shorter progression-free period. Median OS was 11 months (95% CI: 10.402-11.958 months) with an ECOG ≥2 and a poorer response to chemotherapy (less number of chemotherapy cycles) associated with a shorter survival.

Conclusions: Age, gender, comorbidities, tobacco and asbestos exposure, clinical presentation and histopathological diagnosis are not useful prognostic factors in unresectable/advanced PTS, however, an adequate initial ECOG, RECIST and a better response to chemotherapy should be used as prognostic factors in the management of these tumors.

Keywords: Primary thoracic sarcomas (PTS); overall survival (OS); prognostic factors; progression-free survival (PFS); thoracic oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-472/coif). JRRC and JAAA have received research grants for other research protocols/projects, consulting fees working as speaker bureau and participating as advisory board for Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Bayer, Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Novartis, Merch Sharp and Dohme (MSD), Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Takeda, Celltrion, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, GSK, Amgen, Eli Lilly. However, none of these are associated to the current study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PTS histopathological diagnosis. PTS, primary thoracic sarcomas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier PFS. PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier PFS per ECOG. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier OS. OS, overall survival.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier OS per ECOG. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; OS, overall survival.

Similar articles

References

    1. Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Moraco N, et al. Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg 2014;260:416-21; discussion 421-2. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000869 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gamboa AC, Gronchi A, Cardona K. Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:200-29. 10.3322/caac.21605 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sbaraglia M, Bellan E, Dei Tos AP. The 2020 WHO Classification of Soft Tissue Tumours: news and perspectives. Pathologica 2021;113:70-84. 10.32074/1591-951X-213 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. World Health Organisation classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press, 2002.
    1. Blay JY, Honoré C, Stoeckle E, et al. Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1143-53. 10.1093/annonc/mdz124 - DOI - PMC - PubMed