Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 13;1(1):100003.
doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100003. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Influence of Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology Tonometry on Intraocular Pressure

Affiliations

Influence of Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology Tonometry on Intraocular Pressure

Davide Borroni et al. Ophthalmol Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology tonometry (CST) on intraocular pressure (IOP).

Design: Cohort study.

Participants: Patients with and without primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were included.

Methods: Intraocular pressure was measured using the Icare rebound tonometer (ICRT; Icare Finland Oy) and the biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) using the CST. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline with ICRT, followed by a CST measurement in one eye with the fellow eye acting as a control. Icare measurements were repeated at 10 seconds and 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, and 60 minutes in both eyes. The ratio of test eye IOP to fellow eye IOP was used to control for intrasubject variation.

Main outcome measures: Intraocular pressure change following Corneal Visualization Scheimflug Technology tonometry.

Results: Forty participants (mean age, 54.09 ± 20.08 years) were included comprising 20 patients with POAG and 20 patients with no ocular abnormalities other than cataract. Mean central corneal thickness was similar in those without POAG (547.4 ± 55.05 μm) and with POAG (520.22 ± 37.59 μm; P = 0.14). No significant change was found in IOP measured with the ICRT in the fellow eye versus the 1-hour period in either the healthy (P = 0.87) or POAG (P = 0.92) group. Significant changes were found in IOP after CST measurement for both healthy (P < 0.01) and glaucomatous (P < 0.01) eyes. After the CST measurement, the IOP reduced continuously from a mean of 13.75 mmHg to 10.84 mmHg at 4 minutes for healthy eyes and from 13.28 mmHg to 11.11 mmHg at 8 minutes for glaucomatous eyes before approaching (83% for healthy eyes and 92% POAG eyes) the pre-CST measurement at 1 hour.

Conclusions: Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology tonometry causes a significant reduction in IOP in both glaucomatous and healthy eyes that lasts for at least 1 hour afterward.

Keywords: Biomechanics; CCT, central corneal thickness; CST; CST, Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology tonometry; GAT, Goldmann applanation tonometry; Glaucoma; ICRT, Icare rebound tonometer; IOP, intraocular pressure; Intraocular pressure; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; bIOP, biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph showing intraocular pressure (in millimeters of mercury) in treated and fellow eye in the healthy eye group after Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology tonometry measurement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph showing intraocular pressure (in millimeters of mercury) in treated and fellow eyes in the glaucoma group after Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology tonometry measurement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graph showing the mean ratio at each time point of the intraocular pressure in the test eyes to that of the fellow eyes after Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology tonometry measurement in healthy patients and those with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang Y.X., Xu L., Wei W.B., Jonas J.B. Intraocular pressure and its normal range adjusted for ocular and systemic parameters. The Beijing Eye Study 2011. PLoS One. 2018;13 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tham Y.-C., Li X., Wong T.Y., et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090. - PubMed
    1. Konstas A.G., Kahook M.Y., Araie M., et al. Diurnal and 24-h intraocular pressures in glaucoma: monitoring strategies and impact on prognosis and treatment. Adv Ther. 2018;35:1775–1804. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang H., Sun Z., Li L., et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20 23–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zakrzewska A., Wiącek M.P., Machalińska A. Impact of corneal parameters on intraocular pressure measurements in different tonometry methods. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12:1853–1858. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources