Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 22;1(4):100059.
doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100059. eCollection 2021 Dec.

An Initiative to Improve Follow-up of Patients with Glaucoma

Affiliations

An Initiative to Improve Follow-up of Patients with Glaucoma

Calvin C Robbins et al. Ophthalmol Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study describes the implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based initiative aimed at reducing the number of patients with glaucoma-related diagnoses lost to follow-up (LTF) and reviews its short-term outcomes.

Design: Retrospective, comparative case series.

Participants: Patients with glaucoma-related diagnoses seen 1 year prior at the Lahey Medical Center and who had not returned within the 6-month period between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020, which spanned the outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States.

Methods: An EMR-based tool was designed to identify patients suspected of being LTF with glaucoma-related diagnoses. Providers were enlisted to review the EMR for each of these patients and re-engage them, as appropriate. One month later, the initiative was evaluated by means of a retrospective chart review. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify demographic, clinical, and sociomedical factors associated with being LTF.

Main outcome measures: Patients who completed a telemedicine or in-person appointment, or had a future scheduled or ordered return appointment, were considered re-engaged.

Results: Of the 3551 patients seen during the study period, 384 patients were identified as LTF (11%), with 60 identifying COVID-19 as the reason for canceling their visit (16%). Patients who lived farther from the eye clinic (P < 0.001) or who had a history of canceling or missing an appointment (P < 0.001) were more likely to be LTF. Patients with open-angle glaucoma (P = 0.042) or who had completed a visual field (P < 0.001) or ophthalmic imaging (P < 0.001) within the past year were less likely to be LTF. One month after the re-engagement initiative, 124 LTF patients (32%) had been re-engaged (40% through telemedicine), 238 patients (62%) had future scheduling orders in place, and 22 patients (6%) had no active plan for future follow-up.

Conclusions: An EMR-based tool is an effective method for identifying patients at risk of being LTF and provides an opportunity for providers to recall and re-engage patients. Use of telemedicine to recontact LTF patients shows promise of improving the management of glaucoma, enhancing clinical productivity, and documenting treatment plans, thereby potentially reducing medicolegal liability.

Keywords: Adherence; CDR, cup-to-disc ratio; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019; EMR, electronic medical record; Electronic Health Record; Glaucoma; IOP, intraocular pressure; LTF, lost to follow-up; Medical informatics; OR, odds ratio; Open-Angle Glaucoma; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; QI, quality improvement; Quality Improvement; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; Taxonomy; VA, visual acuity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process for patient identification and re-engagement strategy. An electronic medical record (EMR)-based strategy identified 558 potentially lost to follow-up (LTF) patients, of whom 384 patients were identified as LTF, comprising approximately 11% of all patients in the study period. One month after implementation of the quality improvement (QI) initiative, 124 of these LTF patients (32%) had been re-engaged: 40% through telemedicine, 57% with recall ordered or scheduled, and 4% declined follow-up when contacted. An additional 238 LTF patients (62%) had existing scheduling orders in the EMR; only 22 LTF patients (6%) had no active plan for future follow-up care.

References

    1. Ngan R., Lam D.L., Mudumbai R.C., Chen P.P. Risk factors for noncompliance with follow-up among normal-tension glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:310–311. - PubMed
    1. Batra R., Sharma H.E., Elaraoud I., Mohamed S. Resource planning in glaucoma: a tool to evaluate glaucoma service capacity. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33:733–738. - PubMed
    1. Kim Y.K., Jeoung J.W., Park K.H. Understanding the reasons for loss to follow-up in patients with glaucoma at a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Korea. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1059–1065. - PubMed
    1. Davis A., Baldwin A., Hingorani M., et al. A review of 145 234 ophthalmic patient episodes lost to follow-up. Eye. 2017;31:422–429. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldblatt J., Roh S., Sethi K., Ramsey D.J. Enhancing safety and performance in the COVID-19 era: strategies and modifications that may become the standard of care in ophthalmology practice. Ophthalmology Management. 2020;24:E2.

LinkOut - more resources