Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 24;9(7):860-868.
doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13524. eCollection 2022 Oct.

The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alex Medina et al. Mov Disord Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Background: A systematic review of epidemiological studies of primary dystonia from 1985 and 2010 found an overall prevalence of 16.43 per 100,000 (95% CI = 12.09-22.32).

Methods: We performed a systematic review of studies from 2010 and 2022 to determine if there are important differences in epidemiology between these time periods.

Results: Nineteen studies were included. Incidence of cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and oromandibular dystonia were each reported in one study; one study reported incidence for all adult onset idiopathic focal dystonias combined. Using data from 11 studies, we performed random effects meta-analyses of the prevalence of cervical dystonia (9.95 per 100,000; 95% CI = 3.51-28.17), blepharospasm (2.82 per 100,000; 95% CI = 1.12-7.12), laryngeal dystonia (0.40 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.09-1.83), upper limb dystonia (1.27 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.36-4.52), oromandibular dystonia (0.57 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.15-2.15), and idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia all subtypes combined (30.85 per 100,000; 95% CI = 5.06-187.74). All studies reported more cases of dystonia in females. There was no significant difference in prevalence by subgroup analysis based on time of study publication (1985-2010 vs. 2010-2022). Subgroup analysis of differences in prevalence by dystonia subtype by continent using all studies published (1985-2022) revealed significant regional differences in the prevalence of cervical and laryngeal dystonia.

Conclusion: The incidence and prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia in the last decade was not significantly different from earlier reports. Population-based studies across multiple geographic areas are needed to obtain a clearer understanding of the epidemiology of this condition.

Keywords: blepharospasm; dystonia; incidence studies; prevalence studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord 2013;28(7):863–873. 10.1002/mds.25475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fahn S, Bressman SB, Marsden CD. Classification of dystonia. Adv Neurol 1998;78:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Bressman SB. Dystonia genotypes, phenotypes, and classification. Adv Neurol 2004;94:101–107. - PubMed
    1. Steeves TD, Day L, Dykeman J, Jette N, Pringsheim T. The prevalence of primary dystonia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Mov Disord 2012;27(14):1789–1796. 10.1002/mds.25244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Defazio G, Berardelli A. Is adult‐onset dystonia a rare disease? Time for population‐based studies. Mov Disord 2021;36(5):1119–1124. 10.1002/mds.28560. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources