Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;60(3):458-473.
doi: 10.1111/fcre.12654. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

Enhancing Daily Affect in Youth Experiencing High-Conflict Parental Divorce: A Multiple Baseline Trial of an Online Prevention Program

Affiliations

Enhancing Daily Affect in Youth Experiencing High-Conflict Parental Divorce: A Multiple Baseline Trial of an Online Prevention Program

Karey L O'Hara et al. Fam Court Rev. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of a highly interactive, online cognitive-behavioral youth coping program: Children of Divorce-Coping with Divorce (CoD-CoD; Boring et al., 2015) on children exposed to high levels of interparental conflict (IPC). A multiple-baseline experimental design (N = 9) evaluated within-subject intervention effects on change in daily positive and negative affect before, during, and after the intervention (nobservations = 462). Participants were youth ages 11-16 who reported high exposure to IPC and whose parents had filed for divorce or parenting plan determinations in the prior year. A significant interaction effect indicated change in positive affect, but not negative affect, between the intervention and baseline phases. Positive affect linearly decreased during the baseline phase and flattened during the intervention phase. Results indicate that CoD-CoD was effective in interrupting a decline in youth-reported positive affect in a high-IPC sample, which may indicate a buffering effect against depression. Critical future directions include conducting large-scale randomized trials with children from high-IPC families to assess for whom the program is effective and assess long-term effects across a broad range of important outcomes.

Keywords: child mental health; coping; interparental conflict; parental divorce; prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests Statement: Jesse L. Boring and Irwin N. Sandler are partnered in offering the Children of Divorce - Coping with Divorce program commercially through Family Transitions - Programs That Work, LLC.

Figures

Appendix Figure 1.
Appendix Figure 1.
Links between CoD-CoD Program Elements and Putative Mediators. Reprinted from “Children of Divorce – Coping with Divorce: A Randomized Control Trial of an Online Prevention Program for Youth Experiencing Parental Divorce,” by J.L Boring, I. N. Sandler, J. Tein, J. J. Horan, and C. E. Velez, 2015, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, p. 1000. Copyright 2015 by the American Psychological Association. Reprinted with permission.
Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram illustrating recruitment procedures Note. The following legal indicators were used to determine a positive screen for high IPC in court files: response filed to dispute claims in original motion for divorce, court-ordered mediation to settle disputes, orders of protection, petition to modify existing orders, notice of court hearing, filing of temporary orders. IPC = interparental conflict. One participant dropped out of the study prior to completing the intervention and assessments. However, consistent with an intent-to-treat approach, we included all nine participants in the analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph Depicting Model-Implied Values of Positive Affect Across Baseline and Intervention Phases Note. The left side of the graph shows scores on Positive Affect during the baseline period; the right side shows scores on Positive Affect during the intervention period.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graph Depicting Model-Implied Values of Negative Affect Across Baseline and Intervention Phases Note. The left side of the graph shows scores on Negative Affect during the baseline period; the right side shows scores on Negative Affect during the intervention period.

References

    1. Amato PR (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x - DOI
    1. Baek EK, & Ferron JM (2013). Multilevel models for multiple-baseline data: Modeling across-participant variation in autocorrelation and residual variance. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 65–74. 10.3758/s13428-012-0231-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barlow DH, Nock M, & Hersen M (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior for change. Pearson.
    1. Barlow DH, & Nock MK (2009). Why can’t we be more idiographic in our research? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 19–21. - PubMed
    1. Bolger N, & Laurenceau J-P (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.