What's hot and what's not in lay psychology: Wikipedia's most-viewed articles
- PMID: 36248218
- PMCID: PMC9553632
- DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03826-0
What's hot and what's not in lay psychology: Wikipedia's most-viewed articles
Abstract
We studied views of articles about psychology on 10 language editions of Wikipedia from July 1, 2015, to January 6, 2021. We were most interested in what psychology topics Wikipedia users wanted to read, and how the frequency of views changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns. Our results show that the topics of interest to people seeking psychological knowledge changed during the pandemic. In addition, the interests differ noticeably among the languages. We made two important observations. The first was that during the pandemic, people in most countries looked for new ways to manage their stress without resorting to external help. This is understandable, given the increased stress of lockdown and the limited amount of professional help available. We also found that academic topics, typically covered in university classes, experienced a substantial drop in traffic, which could be indicative of issues with remote teaching.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-03826-0.
Keywords: Cross-cultural online behavior; Lay psychology; Wikipedia.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statementThe corresponding author declares serving as a non-paid, voluntary member of the Board of Trustees of Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit publisher of Wikipedia. No other conflict of interest exists.
Figures











Similar articles
-
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 25739399 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Public Interest Based on Wikipedia's Most Visited Medical Articles During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: Search Trends Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 12;23(4):e26331. doi: 10.2196/26331. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33667176 Free PMC article.
-
A Study on User-Oriented Subjects of Child Abuse on Wikipedia: Temporal Analysis of Wikipedia History Versions and Traffic Data.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 17;25:e43901. doi: 10.2196/43901. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37459149 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Wikipedia editing into health professions education: a curricular inventory and review of the literature.Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Dec;9(6):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00620-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8. Perspect Med Educ. 2020. PMID: 33030643 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wikipedia page views for health research: a review.Front Big Data. 2023 Jul 4;6:1199060. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1199060. eCollection 2023. Front Big Data. 2023. PMID: 37469441 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aibar E, Lladós-Masllorens J, Meseguer-Artola A, Minguillón J, Lerga M. Wikipedia at university: What faculty think and do about it. The Electronic Library. 2015;33(4):668–683. doi: 10.1108/EL-12-2013-0217. - DOI
-
- Armstrong, M. (2019). Infographic: The World’s Most Popular Websites. Statista Infographics. https://www.statista.com/chart/17613/most-popular-websites/. Accessed January 2021.
-
- Banasik-Jemielniak, N., Jemielniak, D., & Wilamowski, M. (2021). Psychology and Wikipedia: Measuring psychology journals’ impact by Wikipedia citations. Social Science Computer Review, 40(3), 756–774.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources