Juvenile confinement exacerbates adversity burden: A neurobiological impetus for decarceration
- PMID: 36248654
- PMCID: PMC9561343
- DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1004335
Juvenile confinement exacerbates adversity burden: A neurobiological impetus for decarceration
Abstract
Every year, about 700,000 youth arrests occur in the United States, creating significant neurodevelopmental strain; this is especially concerning as most of these youth have early life adversity exposures that may alter brain development. Males, Black, and Latinx youth, and individuals from low socioeconomic status households have disproportionate contact with the juvenile justice system (JJS). Youth confined in the JJS are frequently exposed to threat and abuse, in addition to separation from family and other social supports. Youths' educational and exploratory behaviors and activities are substantially restricted, and youth are confined to sterile environments that often lack sufficient enrichment resources. In addition to their demonstrated ineffectiveness in preventing future delinquent behaviors, high recidivism rates, and costs, juvenile conditions of confinement likely exacerbate youths' adversity burden and neurodevelopmentally harm youth during the temporally sensitive window of adolescence. Developmentally appropriate methods that capitalize on adolescents' unique rehabilitative potential should be instated through interventions that minimize confinement. Such changes would require joint advocacy from the pediatric and behavioral health care communities. "The distinct nature of children, their initial dependent, and developmental state, their unique human potential as well as their vulnerability, all demand the need for more, rather than less, legal and other protection from all forms of violence (United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2007)."
Keywords: adolescence; adversity; incarceration; juvenile justice; neurodevelopment; stress; trauma.
Copyright © 2022 Orendain, Galván, Smith, Barnert and Chung.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Poly-victimization among juvenile justice-involved youths.Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Oct;37(10):788-800. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 19. Child Abuse Negl. 2013. PMID: 23428165
-
Juvenile justice mental health services.Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Oct;11(4):731-48. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00024-x. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002. PMID: 12397896
-
Advocacy and Collaborative Health Care for Justice-Involved Youth.Pediatrics. 2020 Jul;146(1):e20201755. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1755. Epub 2020 May 6. Pediatrics. 2020. PMID: 32376728
-
A Research Framework for Understanding the Practical Impact of Family Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: The Juvenile Justice Family Involvement Model.Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(3-4):408-21. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6. Am J Community Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26407854 Review.
-
[Temporality and trauma: Towards an articulation between the judicial, educational and psychological times in repeat teenage offenders].Encephale. 2015 Sep;41(4 Suppl 1):S45-9. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(15)30006-3. Encephale. 2015. PMID: 26746322 Review. French.
References
-
- Abram K. M., Azores-gococo N. M., Emanuel K. M., Aaby D. A., Welty L. J., Hershfield J. A., et al. (2017). Sex and racial/ethnic differences in positive outcomes in delinquent youth after detention a 12-year longitudinal study. JAMA Pediatr. 3078 123–132. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3260 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Abrams L. S., Jordan S. P., Montero L. A. (2018). What is a juvenile? A cross-national comparison of youth justice systems. Youth Justice 18 1–20. 10.1177/1473225418779850 - DOI
-
- American Civil Liberties Union (2013). Alone and afraid: Children held in solitary confinement and isolation in juvenile detention and correctional facilities. New York, NY: ACLU.