Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Sep 29:13:977265.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.977265. eCollection 2022.

Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Li Liu et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: We aim to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Pooled analysis was conducted using random-effects model, along with the risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Three RCTs, including 2,290 patients, were included. JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib) plus MTX displayed a higher proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria than JAKi alone at week 52 (ACR20 RD 0.032; 95% CI -0.027 to 0.091; ACR50 RD 0.050; 95% CI 0.003 to 0.097; ACR70 RD 0.056; 95% CI 0.012 to 0.100). Similar results were observed for ACR20/50/70 at week 24. No significant difference was found between two regimens for the proportion of patients achieving Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) improvement ≥ 0.22 at weeks 24 and 52. Regarding low disease activity and remission achievement, JAKi in combination with MTX, contributed higher response rates than JAKi alone at weeks 24 and 52. Compared with JAKi monotherapy, combination therapy had a higher risks of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events (AEs) leading to study discontinuation.

Conclusion: JAKi combined with MTX demonstrated superiority to JAKi monotherapy in terms of ACR responses, low disease activity and remission achievement. The two regimens presented comparable physical functioning measured by HAQ-DI improvement and similar tolerability, except for high risks of TEAEs and AEs leading to study discontinuation in combination therapy.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021288907.

Keywords: combination therapy; janus kinase inhibitors; methotrexate; monotherapy; rheumatoid arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA diagram of the selection of eligible randomized controlled trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of efficacy outcomes for JAKi combination therapy versus JAKi monotherapy (A) Forest plots of efficacy outcomes at week 52; (B) Forest plots of efficacy outcomes at week 24; No. S, numbers of studies; RD, risk difference; CI, confidence interval; I2 , heterogeneity; ACR, American College of Rheumatology criteria; SDAI, Simplified Disease Activity Index; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; DAS28-4(ESR), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; DAS28-4(CRP), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots of safety outcomes for JAKi combination therapy versus JAKi monotherapy No. S, numbers of studies; RD, risk difference; CI, confidence interval; I2 , heterogeneity; TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events; SAEs, serious adverse events; AEs, adverse events; VTE, venous thromboembolism; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sparks JA. Rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Internal Med (2019) 170(1):Itc1–itc16. doi: 10.7326/AITC201901010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann rheumatic Dis (2020) 79(6):685–99. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, St Clair EW, Arayssi T, Carandang K, et al. . 2021 American college of rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (2021) 73(7):924–39. doi: 10.1002/acr.24596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, Weinblatt ME, Del Carmen Morales L, Reyes Gonzaga J, et al. . Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. New Engl J Med (2017) 376(7):652–62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608345 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles-Schoeman C, Wollenhaupt J, Zerbini C, Benda B, et al. . Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet (London England) (9865) 2013:451–60:381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms