Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Dec 1;40(34):3965-3974.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01207. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

Identification of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Experiencing the Highest Benefit From Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting on the Basis of Their Tumor-Intrinsic Chemosensitivity (KELIM): The GOG-0218 Validation Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Identification of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Experiencing the Highest Benefit From Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting on the Basis of Their Tumor-Intrinsic Chemosensitivity (KELIM): The GOG-0218 Validation Study

Benoit You et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer, predictors of bevacizumab efficacy in first-line setting are needed. In the ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled cancer antigen-125 [CA-125] ELIMination rate constant K [KELIM] score) was a predictive biomarker. Only the patients with high-risk disease (suboptimally resected stage III, or stage IV) exhibiting unfavorable KELIM score < 1.0 had overall survival (OS) benefit from bevacizumab (median: 29.7 v 20.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78). An external validation study in the GOG-0218 trial was performed.

Methods: In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel ± concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab/placebo. Patient KELIM values were calculated with CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days by the Lyon University team. The association between KELIM score (favorable ≥ 1.0, or unfavorable < 1.0) and bevacizumab benefit for progression-free survival (PFS)/OS was independently assessed by NGR-GOG using univariate/multivariate analyses.

Results: KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. An unfavorable KELIM score was associated with bevacizumab benefit compared with placebo (PFS: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82; OS: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03), whereas a favorable KELIM was not (PFS: HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; OS: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.39). The highest benefit was observed in patients with a high-risk disease exhibiting unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (median: 9.1 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.78), and for OS (median: 35.1 v 29.1 months; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97).

Conclusion: This GOG-0218 trial investigation validates ICON-7 findings about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab may mainly be effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive disease. Bevacizumab may be prioritized in patients with a high-risk and poorly chemosensitive disease to improve their PFS/OS (patient KELIM score calculator available on the Biomarker Kinetics website).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00262847.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the PFS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with unfavorable or favorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the whole population. HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the OS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with unfavorable or favorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the whole population. HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the PFS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with favorable or unfavorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the population of patients with a high-risk disease (stage IV + stage III operated with suboptimal surgery). HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the OS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with favorable or unfavorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the population of patients with a high-risk disease (stage IV + stage III operated with suboptimal surgery). HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.

Comment in

References

    1. US Food and Drug Administration: FDA approves bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-appro...
    1. Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, et al. : Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2473-2483, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, et al. : A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2484-2496, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Colombo N, Sessa C, Bois AD, et al. : ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: Pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30:672-705, 2019 - PubMed
    1. Collinson F, Hutchinson M, Craven RA, et al. : Predicting response to bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A panel of potential biomarkers informing treatment selection. Clin Cancer Res 19:5227-5239, 2013 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data