Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:36:103224.
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103224. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

Generalizability of treatment outcome prediction in major depressive disorder using structural MRI: A NeuroPharm study

Affiliations

Generalizability of treatment outcome prediction in major depressive disorder using structural MRI: A NeuroPharm study

Vincent Beliveau et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2022.

Abstract

Brain morphology has been suggested to be predictive of drug treatment outcome in major depressive disorders (MDD). The current study aims at evaluating the performance of pretreatment structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures in predicting the outcome of a drug treatment of MDD in a large single-site cohort, and, importantly, to assess the generalizability of these findings in an independent cohort. The random forest, boosted trees, support vector machines and elastic net classifiers were evaluated in predicting treatment response and remission following an eight week drug treatment of MDD using structural brain measures derived with FastSurfer (FreeSurfer). Models were trained and tested within a nested cross-validation framework using the NeuroPharm dataset (n = 79, treatment: escitalopram); their generalizability was assessed using an independent clinical dataset, EMBARC (n = 64, treatment: sertraline). Prediction of antidepressant treatment response in the Neuropharm cohort was statistically significant for the random forest (p = 0.048), whereas none of the models could significantly predict remission. Furthermore, none of the models trained using the entire NeuroPharm dataset could significantly predict treatment outcome in the EMBARC dataset. Although our primary findings in the NeuroPharm cohort support some, but limited value in using pretreatment structural brain MRI to predict drug treatment outcome in MDD, the models did not generalize to an independent cohort suggesting limited clinical applicability. This study emphasizes the importance of assessing model generalizability for establishing clinical utility.

Keywords: MDD; Prediction; Remission; SSRI; Structural MRI; Treatment response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart for the NeuroPharm dataset presenting the assignment to the response and remission groups based on the clinical assessment of HAMD-6 at week 8.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the different classifiers for the classification of (A) response and (B) remission in the NeuroPharm dataset.

References

    1. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage. 2007;38:95–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartlett E.A., DeLorenzo C., Sharma P., Yang J., Zhang M., Petkova E., Weissman M., McGrath P.J., Fava M., Ogden R.T., Kurian B.T., Malchow A., Cooper C.M., Trombello J.M., McInnis M., Adams P., Oquendo M.A., Pizzagalli D.A., Trivedi M., Parsey R.V. Pretreatment and early-treatment cortical thickness is associated with SSRI treatment response in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:2221–2230. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0122-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belov, V., Erwin-Grabner, T., Gonul, A.S., Amod, A.R., Ojha, A., Dols, A., Scharntee, A., Uyar-Demir, A., Harrison, B.J., Besteher, B., Klimes-Dougan, B., Zarate, C., Davey, C.G., Ching, C.R.K., Connolly, C.G., Stein, D.J., Dima, D., Linden, D.E.J., Mehler, D.M.A., Pozzi, E., Melloni, E., Benedetti, F., MacMaster, F.P., Grabe, J., Völzke, H., Gotlib, I.H., Soares, J.C., Evans, J.W., Sim, K., Wittfeld, K., Cullen, K., Reneman, L., Oudega, M.L., Portella, M.J., Sacchet, M.D., Li, M., Aghajani, M., Wu, M.-J., Jahanshad, N., Saemann, P., Bülow, R., Poletti, S., Whittle, S., Thomopoulos, S.I., van, J.A., Basgoze, Z., Veltman, D.J., Schmaal, L., Thompson, P.M., Unpublished results. Multi-site benchmark classification of major depressive disorder using machine learning on cortical and subcortical measures 56. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.08122.
    1. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.
    1. Brandt I.M., Köhler-Forsberg K., Ganz M., Ozenne B., Jorgensen M.B., Poulsen A., Knudsen G.M., Frokjaer V.G., Fisher P.M. Reward processing in major depressive disorder and prediction of treatment response – Neuropharm study. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;44:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.12.010. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms