Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;27(1):114-121.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05481-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

Does the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Accurately Represent the Impact of Bowel Dysfunction on Health-Related Quality of Life?

Affiliations

Does the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Accurately Represent the Impact of Bowel Dysfunction on Health-Related Quality of Life?

Anna Wang et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery is common, but its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is complex. Objective measures of bowel function may not be a good representation on the actual impact on HRQOL. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine whether there are differences between patient-reported bowel-related impairment versus a standardized measure of bowel dysfunction on HRQOL.

Methods: A prospective database starting in September 2018 of adult patients who had undergone sphincter preserving rectal cancer surgery up to October 2021 was queried. Patients were excluded if they had local recurrence, metastasis, persistent stoma, or had less than 1-year follow-up. Patients were administered the study instruments at their standard surveillance visit: patient-reported bowel-related quality of life(BQOL) impairment, HRQOL using the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and bowel dysfunction using the low anterior resection syndrome(LARS) score.

Results: Overall, 136 patients were included. There were 43% with no LARS, 22% with minor LARS, and 35% with major LARS. For the BQOL, 26% of subjects reported no impairment, 57% minor impairment, and 17% major impairment. There was a high proportion of discordance between BQOL and LARS, with 23% minor or major LARS in patients with no BQOL impairment, and 32% with no or minor LARS with major BQOL impairment. The BQOL was associated with more changes in SF-36 scores compared to the LARS score.

Conclusions: The patient-reported BQOL is likely to be a more relevant outcome of interest to patients than the objective LARS score. This has important implications for shared decision-making for rectal cancer treatments.

Keywords: Functional outcomes; Low anterior resection syndrome; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Mohammed S, Anaya DA, Awad SS, Albo D, Berger DH, Artinyan A. Sphincter preservation rates after radical resection for rectal cancer in the United States veteran population: opportunity for improvement in early disease. Ann Surg Oncol.= 2015;22(1):216–223. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4101-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahjehan F, Kasi PM, Habermann E, Day CN, Colibaseanu DT, Mathis KL, Larson DW, Merchea A. Trends and outcomes of sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a national cancer database study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(2):239–245. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3171-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD04323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004323.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Rashid F, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman LS, Fiore JF, Jr, Lee L. The impact of bowel dysfunction on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02594-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr AJ, Higginson IJ. Are quality of life measures patient centred? BMJ. 2001;322(7298):1357–1360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1357. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types