Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 19:55:jrm00342.
doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.3199.

Ultrasound Assessment of Spastic Muscles in Ambulatory Chronic Stroke Survivors Reveals Function-Dependent Changes

Affiliations

Ultrasound Assessment of Spastic Muscles in Ambulatory Chronic Stroke Survivors Reveals Function-Dependent Changes

Javier González-Buonomo et al. J Rehabil Med. .

Abstract

Objective: To correlate ultrasound characteristics of spastic muscles with clinical and functional measurements in chronic stroke survivors.

Methods: Ultrasound assessment and clinical and functional assessments were performed in 28 ambulatory stroke survivors (12 females, mean age 57.8 ± 11.8 years, 76 ± 45 months after stroke).

Results: Muscle thickness in the affected side was decreased compared with the contralateral side (p < 0.001). The decrease was more evident in the upper limb muscles. On the affected side, the modified Heckmatt scale score was lowest (closer to normal) in the rectus femoris (RF) muscle compared with other muscles (biceps brachii (BB), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) and medial gastrocnemius (MG)). Muscle thickness and echogenicity of spastic muscles did not correlate with spasticity, as measured with the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer motor assessment scores, age, or time since stroke. There was a significant negative correlation between grip strength and percentage decrease in muscle thickness for the spastic FCU muscle (r = -0.49, p = 0.008). RF muscle thickness correlated with ambulatory function (Timed Up and Go test (r = 0.44, p = 0.021) and 6-metre walk test (r = 0.41, p = 0.032)). There was no significant correlation between echogenicity and functional assessments Conclusion: Ambulatory chronic stroke survivors had function-dependent changes in muscle thickness on the affected side. Muscle thickness and echogenicity of spastic muscles did not correlate with spasticity, Fugl-Meyer motor assessment scores, age, or time since stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative ultrasound images of spastic muscles of the upper limb (FCU: flexor carpi ulnaris; BB: biceps brachii). Each muscle pair corresponds to the affected (A) and unaffected (U) sides of the same subject. Images from 2 different subjects are shown. The length of the white arrows represents muscle thickness. Modified Heckmatt scale shows increased echogenicity in affected spastic muscles.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative ultrasound images of spastic muscles of the lower limb (RF: rectus femoris; MG: medial gastrocnemius). Each muscle image pair corresponds to the affected (A) and unaffected (U) sides of the same subject. Images from 2 different subjects are shown. The length of the white arrows represents muscle thickness. Modified Heckmatt scale shows increased echogenicity in affected spastic muscles.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Percentage decrease in muscle thickness of the affected side with reference to the unaffected side in muscles of the upper and lower limb (BB: biceps brachii; FCU: flexor carpi ulnaris; RF: rectus femoris; MG: medial gastrocnemius). No significant difference in reduction in muscle thickness was seen between muscles of the same limb. A significantly greater decrease in muscle thickness was observed in upper limb compared with lower limb muscles (p < 0.001). (B) Box and whisker plot of modified Heckmatt scale of muscles on the affected side. The modified Heckmatt scale score was significantly lower in the RF than in other muscles (p < 0.001). *Statistically significant difference.

References

    1. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, et al. . World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Intl J Stroke 2022; 17: 18–29. - PubMed
    1. Beckwée D, Lefeber N, Bautmans I, Cuypers L, De Keersmaecker E, De Raedt S, et al. . Muscle changes after stroke and their impact on recovery: time for a paradigm shift? Review and commentary. Top Stroke Rehabil 2021; 28: 104–111. - PubMed
    1. Scherbakov N, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Dirnagl U, Doehner W. Stroke induced sarcopenia: muscle wasting and disability after stroke. Intl J Cardiol 2013; 170: 89–94. - PubMed
    1. Su Y, Yuki M, Otsuki M. Prevalence of stroke-related sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29: 105092. - PubMed
    1. Azzollini V, Dalise S, Chisari C. How does stroke affect skeletal muscle? State of the art and rehabilitation perspective. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 797559. - PMC - PubMed