Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 9;22(21):8519-8525.
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02994. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

Diffusion 19F-NMR of Nanofluorides: In Situ Quantification of Colloidal Diameters and Protein Corona Formation in Solution

Diffusion 19F-NMR of Nanofluorides: In Situ Quantification of Colloidal Diameters and Protein Corona Formation in Solution

Reut Mashiach et al. Nano Lett. .

Abstract

The NMR-detectability of elements of organic ligands that stabilize colloidal inorganic nanocrystals (NCs) allow the study of their diffusion characteristics in solutions. Nevertheless, these measurements are sensitive to dynamic ligand exchange and often lead to overestimation of diffusion coefficients of dispersed colloids. Here, we present an approach for the quantitative assessment of the diffusion properties of colloidal NCs based on the NMR signals of the elements of their inorganic cores. Benefiting from the robust 19F-NMR signals of the fluorides in the core of colloidal CaF2 and SrF2, we show the immunity of 19F-diffusion NMR to dynamic ligand exchange and, thus, the ability to quantify, with high accuracy, the colloidal diameters of different types of nanofluorides in situ. With the demonstrated ability to characterize the formation of protein corona at the surface of nanofluorides, we envision that this study can be extended to additional formulations and applications.

Keywords: 19F-NMR; colloids; diffusion; nanocrystals; protein corona.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characterization of nanofluorides. Size distribution of colloidal nanofluorides as measured with DLS for (a) AEP-CaF2, dDLS = 4.6 ± 1.1 nm, (b) Cit-CaF2, dDLS = 4.9 ± 1.1 nm, (c) AEP-SrF2dDLS = 7.1 ± 1.7 nm and for (d) OA-CaF2, dDLS = 10.0 ± 1.8 nm. High-resolution, liquid-state 19F-NMR (376.7 MHz, 298 K) of AEP-CaF2 (e), Cit-CaF2 (f), AEP-SrF2 (g), and OA-CaF2 (h). (a–c) and (e–g) Colloids dispersed in D2O. (d) and (h) Colloids dispersed in cyclohexane-d12.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diffusion experiments of nanofluorides. (a) Schematic illustration of the diffusion NMR characteristics of the ligand (1H NMR) and core (19F-NMR) content of the studied colloid. (b) Representative stack-plot of 19F-NMR signal (of AEP-CaF2) decay as a function of the applied diffusion gradient. Logarithmic normalized 19F /1H signal intensity as a function of the experimental b-values obtained from (c) AEP-CaF2 in D2O, (d) Cit-CaF2 in D2O, (e) AEP-SrF2 in D2O, and (f) OA-CaF2 in cyclohexane-d12. Colored spheres are the 19F diffusion measurements of NCs, colored circles are 1H diffusion measurements of ligands in NCs sample, and the dashed gray line is the line fitting of the diffusion NMR of free ligands. In the insets is a schematic of the equilibrium between the ligands and the NCs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diffusion 19F-NMR of nanofluorides. (a) Logarithmic normalized 19F-NMR signal intensity as a function of the experimental b-values (eq S1, see supporting notes); AEP-CaF2 (pink), Cit-CaF2 (blue), and AEP-SrF2 (turquoise) dispersed in D2O. (b) Correlating NCs diameter evaluated from diffusion 19F-NMR and DLS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diffusion 19F-NMR of protein adsorption on NCs in water (a) Schematic illustration of the protein adsorption on AEP-CaF2 NCs surface. (b) Diffusion 19F-NMR of AEP-CaF2 in D2O before and after the addition of lysozyme proteins with an increased protein-to-nanofluoride ratio, as noted.

References

    1. Brownian Motion. In Colloidal Dispersions, Saville D. A., Russel W. B., Schowalter W. R., Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989; pp 65–87.
    1. Kohli I.; Mukhopadhyay A. Diffusion of Nanoparticles in Semidilute Polymer Solutions: Effect of Different Length Scales. Macromolecules. 2012, 45 (15), 6143–6149. 10.1021/ma301237r. - DOI
    1. Röcker C.; Pötzl M.; Zhang F.; Parak W. J.; Nienhaus G. U. A Quantitative Fluorescence Study of Protein Monolayer Formation on Colloidal Nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4 (9), 577–580. 10.1038/nnano.2009.195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu T. Y.; Hu S. H.; Liu T. Y.; Liu D. M.; Chen S. Y. Magnetic-Sensitive Behavior of Intelligent Ferrogels for Controlled Release of Drug. Langmuir 2006, 22 (14), 5974–8. 10.1021/la060371e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moncure P. J.; Simon Z. C.; Millstone J. E.; Laaser J. E. Relationship between Gel Mesh and Particle Size in Determining Nanoparticle Diffusion in Hydrogel Nanocomposites. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126 (22), 4132–4142. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00771. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources