IMPACT OF TIME TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT RESUSCITATIVE AORTIC OCCLUSION AFTER NONCOMPRESSIBLE TORSO HEMORRHAGE
- PMID: 36256624
- DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001988
IMPACT OF TIME TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT RESUSCITATIVE AORTIC OCCLUSION AFTER NONCOMPRESSIBLE TORSO HEMORRHAGE
Abstract
Introduction: Time is an essential element in outcomes of trauma patients. The relationship of time to treatment in management of noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) or resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) has not been previously described. We hypothesized that shorter times to intervention would reduce mortality. Methods: A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry from 2013 to 2022 was performed to identify patients who underwent emergency department aortic occlusion (AO). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of time to treatment on mortality. Results: A total of 1,853 patients (1,245 [67%] RT, 608 [33%] REBOA) were included. Most patients were male (82%) with a median age of 34 years (interquartile range, 30). Median time from injury to admission and admission to successful AO were 31 versus 11 minutes, respectively. Patients who died had shorter median times from injury to successful AO (44 vs. 72 minutes, P < 0.001) and admission to successful AO (10 vs. 22 minutes, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that receiving RT was the strongest predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-9.9; P < 0.001). Time from injury to admission and admission to successful AO were not significant. This finding was consistent in subgroup analysis of RT-only and REBOA-only populations. Conclusions: Despite expedited interventions, time to aortic occlusion did not significantly impact mortality. This may suggest that rapid in-hospital intervention was often insufficient to compensate for severe exsanguination and hypovolemia that had already occurred before emergency department presentation. Selective prehospital advanced resuscitative care closer to the point of injury with "scoop and control" efforts including hemostatic resuscitation warrants special consideration.
Copyright © 2022 by the Shock Society.
Conflict of interest statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Morrison JJ: Noncompressible torso hemorrhage. Crit Care Clin 33(1):37–54, 2017.
-
- Abe T, Uchida M, Nagata I, Saitoh D, Tamiya N: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus aortic cross clamping among patients with critical trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Japan. Crit Care 20(1):400, 2016.
-
- Belenkiy SM, Batchinsky AI, Rasmussen TE, Cancio LC: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control: past, present, and future. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(4 Suppl 2):S236–S242, 2015.
-
- Ledgerwood AM, Kazmers M, Lucas CE: The role of thoracic aortic occlusion for massive hemoperitoneum. J Trauma 16(8):610–615, 1976.
-
- Seamon MJ, Haut ER, Van Arendonk K, Barbosa RR, Chiu WC, Dente CJ, Fox N, Jawa RS, Khwaja K, Lee JK, et al.: An evidence-based approach to patient selection for emergency department thoracotomy: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(1):159–173, 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
