Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

The shared decision-making model and practical discourse to foster the appreciation of patients’ value preferences in Polish healthcare: Discussing potentials and challenges

In: Defining the Value of Medical Interventions: Normative and Empirical Challenges [Internet]. Stuttgart (DE): W. Kohlhammer GmbH; 2021.
Free Books & Documents
Review

The shared decision-making model and practical discourse to foster the appreciation of patients’ value preferences in Polish healthcare: Discussing potentials and challenges

Karolina Napiwodzka.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

The aim of the paper is to consider the potential and challenges regarding the implementation of the shared decision-making approach in the Polish health care system, also taking into account the moral and communicative-discursive advantages of such a change. The paper consists of several sections, in which the author: defines the objectives and method of the paper (Sections 1, 2), presents the theoretical background of changes in health care (Section 3), and outlines the characteristics of Polish health care and the legal-institutional framework in Poland after the democratic turn in 1989 in terms of the ongoing communicative crisis in the relations between patients and health providers (Section 4). Next, the author distinguishes the ethical essentials of shared decision making, also presenting its affinities with J. Habermas’ communication and discourse ethics, as an approach which can be applied in the clinical practice of medicine (Section 5), including the shared responsibility principle (Section 6). The next step was to name reasons for which health and medical values, SDM and practical discourse ethics can be linked together (Section 7). Then the author considers how the SDM model could be implemented through sampling cases from other countries (Section 8). Subsequently, she describes structural and normative potentials to adapt SDM and practical discourse ethics for Polish public health care (Section 9). A discussion follows.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antoun J, Phillips F, Johnson T. “Post-Soviet transition: Improving health services delivery and management”. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. 2011;Vol. 78:pp. 436–448. - PubMed
    1. Barrett B, Ricco J, Wallace M, Kiefer D, Rakel D. “Communicating statin evidence to support shared decision-making”. BMC Family Practice. 2016;Vol. 17(No. 41) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bae J.-M. “Shared decision making: Relevant concepts and facilitating strategies”. Epidemiology and Health. 2017;Vol. 39:e201748. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp T. L, Childress J. F. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
    1. Borek E, Chwialkowska A. “Partycypacja pacjentów w procesie podejmowania decyzji w ochronie zdrowia w Polsce [Patients participation and shared decision-making in the polish healthcare system]”. Journal of Health Sciences. 2014;Vol. 4(No. 1):pp. 289–296.

LinkOut - more resources