Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 18;7(4):e38869.
doi: 10.2196/38869.

Use of Telecommunication and Diabetes-Related Technologies in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes During a Time of Sudden Isolation: Mixed Methods Study

Elena Toschi  1   2   3 , Christine Slyne  1 , Katie Weinger  1 , Sarah Sy  1 , Kayla Sifre  1 , Amy Michals  1 , DaiQuann Davis  1 , Rachel Dewar  1 , Astrid Atakov-Castillo  1 , Saira Haque  4 , Stirling Cummings  4 , Stephen Brown  4 , Medha Munshi  1   2   3
Affiliations

Use of Telecommunication and Diabetes-Related Technologies in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes During a Time of Sudden Isolation: Mixed Methods Study

Elena Toschi et al. JMIR Diabetes. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 lockdown imposed a sudden change in lifestyle with self-isolation and a rapid shift to the use of technology to maintain clinical care and social connections.

Objective: In this mixed methods study, we explored the impact of isolation during the lockdown on the use of technology in older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: Older adults (aged ≥65 years) with T1D using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) participated in semistructured interviews during the COVID-19 lockdown. A multidisciplinary team coded the interviews. In addition, CGM metrics from a subgroup of participants were collected before and during the lockdown.

Results: We evaluated 34 participants (mean age 71, SD 5 years). Three themes related to technology use emerged from the thematic analysis regarding the impact of isolation on (1) insulin pump and CGM use to manage diabetes, including timely access to supplies, and changing Medicare eligibility regulations; (2) technology use for social interaction; and (3) telehealth use to maintain medical care. The CGM data from a subgroup (19/34, 56%; mean age 74, SD 5 years) showed an increase in time in range (mean 57%, SD 17% vs mean 63%, SD 15%; P=.001), a decrease in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL; mean 41%, SD 19% vs mean 35%, SD 17%; P<.001), and no change in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL; median 0.7%, IQR 0%-2% vs median 1.1%, IQR 0%-4%; P=.40) during the lockdown compared to before the lockdown.

Conclusions: These findings show that our cohort of older adults successfully used technology during isolation. Participants provided the positive and negative perceptions of technology use. Clinicians can benefit from our findings by identifying barriers to technology use during times of isolation and developing strategies to overcome these barriers.

Keywords: COVID-19; continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes; diabetes technology; glucose monitoring; health technology; older adults; older population; telehealth; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: MM is a consultant for Sanofi. SH is an employee and shareholder at Pfizer. All other authors declared no other conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Jaana M, Paré Guy. Comparison of mobile health technology use for self-tracking between older adults and the general adult population in Canada: cross-sectional survey. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/11/e24718/ v8i11e24718 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen-Mansfield J, Shmotkin D, Hazan H. The effect of homebound status on older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2358–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03172.x. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21087220 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qiu W, Dean M, Liu T, George L, Gann M, Cohen J, Bruce Martha L. Physical and mental health of homebound older adults: an overlooked population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2423–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03161.x. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21070195 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhaliwal R, Weinstock R. Management of type 1 diabetes in older adults. Diabetes Spectr. 2014 Feb;27(1):9–20. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.27.1.9. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26246751 9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinstock RS, Schütz-Fuhrmann Ingrid, Connor CG, Hermann JM, Maahs DM, Schütt Morten, Agarwal S, Hofer SE, Beck RW, Holl RW, T1D Exchange Clinic Network. DPV Initiative Type 1 diabetes in older adults: comparing treatments and chronic complications in the United States T1D Exchange and the German/Austrian DPV registries. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Dec;122:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.09.024.S0168-8227(16)30671-4 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources