Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 18;22(1):448.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02468-9.

The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study

Affiliations

The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study

Yu-Qi Sun et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Alveolar osteitis (AO) is one of the most commonly encountered complication following tooth extraction, however, to date there is no standard methods of prevention and treatment. The study aims to investigate the efficiency of minocycline hydrochloride ointment (MHO) for the treatment of alveolar osteitis compared with traditional treatment with iodoform gauze (IG).

Methods/design: STROBE checklist was followed to report this study. All patients underwent tooth extraction either in our department or other hospitals, whom presented with postoperative pain, were screened out to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study about AO. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our prospective cohort study, and MHO or IG was administered. The Visual analog scale scores were used to assess the pain score of patients. The healing status of the extraction sockets was followed up. Differences in responses between groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Chi-square test was performed to explore the differences in the teeth position of AO.

Results: Of 41,371 patients underwent tooth extraction with post-operative follow-up in our departments, only 20 patients (0.05%) suffered from AO. 31 patients with AO, whose teeth were extracted in other places, were also enrolled. The incidence of AO was significantly higher in third molars than other teeth (P < 0.01). In 28 patients that were treated with MHO, the pain was relieved substantially on day 3 and almost painless on day 7. And only 25% of cases required dressing change more than once. Whilst 23 patients treated with IG, the pain was relieved on day 5, and 56.5% of cases required multiple dressing change. The difference between the two groups of VAS scores had statistical significance during treatment at 8 h, 24 h, 3d, 5d, and 7d. No allergic reaction or further infection occurred.

Conclusion: MHO has a safer and higher therapeutic effect in the treatment of AO compared with traditional treatment with IG. MHO may become a preferred treatment modality for AO.

Keywords: Alveolar osteitis; Iodoform gauze; Minocycline; Therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The process of treatment with MHO for AO: A, Preoperative clinical view of AO in right maxillary second premolar region; B, x-ray image; C, After alveolar irrigation of socket with saline; D-E, Placement of MHO; F-G, Postoperative 5th day, MHO was still attached to the alveolar bone (F), and granulation tissue formation was observed in the socket after irrigation (G); H, Postoperative 20th day, the alveolar socket was healed, and a small amount of MHO remained in it
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The flow diagram for the included studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
VAS scores of patients in both groups after treatment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chow O, Wang R, Ku D, Huang W. Alveolar Osteitis: A Review of Current Concepts. J oral maxillofacial surgery: official J Am Association Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2020;78(8):1288–96. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blum IR. Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(3):309–17. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0263. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mamoun J. Dry Socket Etiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Treatment Techniques. J Korean Association Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2018;44(2):52–8. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.2.52. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Çebi AT. Evaluation of the effects of intra-alveolar irrigation with clindamycin, rifampicin and sterile saline in alveolar osteitis treatment. J stomatology oral maxillofacial Surg. 2020;121(6):680–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.01.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Supe NB, Choudhary SH, Yamyar SM, Patil KS, Choudhary AK, Kadam VD. Efficacy of Alvogyl (Combination of Iodoform + Butylparaminobenzoate) and Zinc Oxide Eugenol for Dry Socket. Annals of maxillofacial surgery. 2018;8(2):193–9. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_167_18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources