Bridging the European Data Sharing Divide in Genomic Science
- PMID: 36260387
- PMCID: PMC9631173
- DOI: 10.2196/37236
Bridging the European Data Sharing Divide in Genomic Science
Abstract
In this viewpoint, we argue for the importance of creating data spaces for genomic research that are detached from contexts in which fundamental rights concerns related to surveillance measures override a purpose-specific balancing of fundamental rights. Genomic research relies on molecular and phenotypic data, on comparing findings within large data sets, on searchable metadata, and on translating research results into a clinical setting. These methods require sensitive genetic and health data to be shared across borders. International data sharing between the European Union (EU) or the European Economic Area and third countries has accordingly become a cornerstone of genomics. The EU General Data Protection Regulation contains rules that accord privileged status to data processing for research purposes to ensure that strict data protection requirements do not impede biomedical research. However, the General Data Protection Regulation rules applicable to international transfers of data accord no such preferential treatment to international data transfers made in the research context. The rules that govern the international transfer of data create considerable barriers to international data sharing because of the cost-intensive procedural and substantive compliance burdens that they impose. For certain jurisdictions and select use cases, there exist practically no lawful mechanisms to enable the international transfer of data because of concerns about the protection of fundamental rights. The proposed solutions further fail to address the need to share large data sets of local and regional cohorts across national borders to enable joint analyses. The European Health Data Space is an emerging federated, EU-wide data infrastructure that is intended to function as an infrastructure bringing together EU health data to improve patient care and enable the secondary use of health-related data for research purposes. Such infrastructure is implementing new institutions to support its functioning and is being implemented in reliance on a new enabling law, the regulation on the European Health Data Space. This innovation provides the opportunity to facilitate EU contribution to international genomic research efforts. The draft regulation for this data space provides for a concept of data infrastructure intended to enable cross-border data exchange and access, including access to genetic and health data for scientific analysis purposes. The draft regulation also provides for obligations of national actors aimed at making data widely available. This effort is laudable. However, in the absence of further, more fundamental changes to the manner in which the EU regulates the secondary use of health data, it is reasonable to believe that EU participation in international genomic research efforts will remain impeded.
Keywords: data protection; genomics; international data transfer; safe data spaces; scientific research.
©Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor, Michael J S Beauvais, Alexander Bernier, Maria Pilar Nicolas Jimenez, Mikel Recuero, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 19.10.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: FMG is a member of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. The views presented in the manuscript are not necessarily those of the Group. MB, AB, PN, MRL, and BMK declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature. 2020 Feb 05;578(7793):82–93. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32025007 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Regev A, Teichmann S, Lander E, Amit I, Benoist C, Birney E, Bodenmiller B, Campbell P, Carninci P, Clatworthy M, Clevers H, Deplancke B, Dunham I, Eberwine J, Eils R, Enard W, Farmer A, Fugger L, Göttgens B, Hacohen N, Haniffa M, Hemberg M, Kim S, Klenerman P, Kriegstein A, Lein E, Linnarsson S, Lundberg E, Lundeberg J, Majumder P, Marioni JC, Merad M, Mhlanga M, Nawijn M, Netea M, Nolan G, Pe'er D, Phillipakis A, Ponting CP, Quake S, Reik W, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Sanes J, Satija R, Schumacher TN, Shalek A, Shapiro E, Sharma P, Shin JW, Stegle O, Stratton M, Stubbington MJ, Theis FJ, Uhlen M, van Oudenaarden A, Wagner A, Watt F, Weissman J, Wold B, Xavier R, Yosef N, Human Cell Atlas Meeting Participants The human cell Atlas. Elife. 2017 Dec 05;6:7041. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27041. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27041. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1-88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
-
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2020, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems, Case C-311/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:559 (“Schrems II”) 2020 doi: 10.1007/s40319-020-00967-2. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0311 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
