Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan;51(1):15-28.
doi: 10.1111/joor.13380. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

The development of the Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB): An international road map

Affiliations
Review

The development of the Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB): An international road map

Daniele Manfredini et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

This paper summarises the background reasoning and work that led to the selection of the items included in the Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB), also introducing the list of items. The instrument is currently being tested for face validity and on-field comprehension. The underlying premise is that the different motor activities included in the bruxism spectrum (e.g. clenching vs. grinding, with or without teeth contact) potentially need to be discriminated from each other, based on their purportedly different aetiology, comorbidities and potential consequences. Focus should be on a valid impression of the activities' frequency, intensity and duration. The methods that can be used for the above purposes can be grouped into strategies that collect information from the patient's history (subject-based), from the clinical assessment performed by an examiner (clinically based) or from the use of instruments to measure certain outcomes (instrumentally based). The three strategies can apply to all aspects of bruxism (i.e. status, comorbid conditions, aetiology and consequences). The STAB will help gathering information on many aspects, factors and conditions that are currently poorly investigated in the field of bruxism. To this purpose, it is divided into two axes. Axis A includes the self-reported information on bruxism status and potential consequences (subject-based report) together with the clinical (examiner report) and instrumental assessment (technology report). Axis B includes the self-reported information (subject-based report) on factors and conditions that may have an etiological or comorbid role for bruxism. This comprehensive multidimensional assessment system will allow building predictive model for clinical and research purposes.

Keywords: Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism; assessment; awake bruxism; bruxism; sleep bruxism.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:2-4.
    1. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Wetselaar P, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:837-844.
    1. Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Wetselaar P, Svensson P, Lobbezoo F. The bruxism construct: from cut-off points to a continuum spectrum. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:991-997.
    1. Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism definition: past, present, and future - what should a prosthodontist know? J Prosthet Dent. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.026
    1. Rompré PH, Daigle-Landry D, Guitard F, Montplaisir JY, Lavigne GJ. Identification of a sleep bruxism subgroup with a higher risk of pain. J Dent Res. 2007;86:837-842.

LinkOut - more resources