Exercise-Induced Tendon and Bone Injury in Recreational Runners: A Test-Retest Reliability Study
- PMID: 36262008
- PMCID: PMC6858051
- DOI: 10.2196/resprot.4585
Exercise-Induced Tendon and Bone Injury in Recreational Runners: A Test-Retest Reliability Study
Abstract
Background: Long-distance runners are prone to injuries including Achilles tendinopathy and medial tibial stress syndrome. We have developed an Internet comprehensive self-report questionnaire examining the medical history, injury history, and running habits of adult recreational runners.
Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate two alternative forms of test-retest reliability of a comprehensive self-report Internet questionnaire retrospectively examining the medical history, injury history, and running habits among a sample of adult recreational runners. This will contribute to the broad aims of a wider study investigating genetics and running injury.
Methods: Invitations to complete an Internet questionnaire were sent by email to a convenience pilot population (test group 1). Inclusion criteria required participants to be a recreational runner age 18 or over, who ran over 15 km per week on a consistent basis. The survey questions addressed regular running habits and any injuries (including signs, symptoms, and diagnosis) of the lower limbs that resulted in discontinuation of running for a period of 2 consecutive weeks or more, within the last 2 years. Questions also addressed general health, age, sex, height, weight, and ethnic background. Participants were then asked to repeat the survey using the Internet platform again after 10-14 days. Following analysis of test group 1, we soft-launched the survey to a larger population (test group 2), through a local running club of 900 members via email platform. The same inclusion criteria applied, however, participants were asked to complete a repeat of the survey by telephone interview after 7-10 days. Selected key questions, important to clarify inclusion or exclusion from the wider genetics study, were selected to evaluate test-retest reliability. Reliability was quantified using the kappa coefficient for categorical data.
Results: In response to the invitation, 28 participants accessed the survey from test group 1, 23 completed the Internet survey on the first occasion, and 20 completed the Internet retest within 10-21 days. Test-retest reliability scored moderate to almost perfect (kappa=.41 to .99) for 19/19 of the key questions analyzed. Following the invitation, 122 participants accessed the survey from test group 2, 101 completed the Internet survey on the first occasion, and 50 were randomly selected and contacted by email inviting them to repeat the survey by telephone interview. There were 33 participants that consented to the telephone interview and 30 completed the questionnaire within 7-10 days. Test-retest reliability scored moderate to almost perfect for 18/19 (kappa=.41 to .99) and slight for 1/19 of the key questions analyzed.
Keywords: exercise; genetics; injury; reliability; survey.
©Renae Domaschenz, Nicole Vlahovich, Justin Keogh, Stacey Compton, David C Hughes, Collaborative Research Network For Advancing Exercise & Sports Science Scientific Committee. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.10.2015.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Tapering Practices of Strongman Athletes: Test-Retest Reliability Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(10):e211. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8522. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017. PMID: 29089292 Free PMC article.
-
Achilles tendon structure differs between competitive distance runners and nonrunners despite no clinical signs or symptoms of midsubstance tendinopathy.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Aug 1;125(2):453-458. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00012.2018. Epub 2018 May 17. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018. PMID: 29771609
-
A profile of health, lifestyle and training habits of 4720 Australian recreational runners-The case for promoting running for health benefits.Health Promot J Austr. 2019 Apr;30(2):172-179. doi: 10.1002/hpja.30. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Health Promot J Austr. 2019. PMID: 30972899
-
Biomechanical risk factors for running-related injury differ by sample population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 May;75:104991. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.104991. Epub 2020 Mar 14. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020. PMID: 32203864
-
Reliability of Key Measures in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health [Internet].Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2010 Feb. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2010 Feb. PMID: 30199182 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Tapering Practices of Strongman Athletes: Test-Retest Reliability Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(10):e211. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8522. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017. PMID: 29089292 Free PMC article.
-
Recruitment and Participation of Recreational Runners in a Large Epidemiological and Genetic Research Study: Retrospective Data Analysis.JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 23;7(5):e141. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8243. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018. PMID: 29792293 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nielsen RO, Buist I, Sørensen Henrik, Lind M, Rasmussen S. Training errors and running related injuries: A systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;7(1):58–75. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22389869 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tonoli C, Cumps E, Aerts I, Verhagen E, Meeusen R. Incidence, Risk Factors and Prevention of Running Related Injuries in Long-Distance Running: A Systematic Review Injury, Location and Type. 2010. [2015-09-22]. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/256398048_Incidence_risk_factors... .
-
- Ferber R, Hreljac A, Kendall KD. Suspected mechanisms in the cause of overuse running injuries: A clinical review. Sports Health. 2009 May;1(3):242–246. doi: 10.1177/1941738109334272. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23015879 10.1177_1941738109334272 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous