Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):4070-4080.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16562. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

Following a standardised pathway: Healthcare professionals' perspectives on person-centred care within ERAS for patients with colorectal cancer

Åsa Petersson  1 , Amanda Hellström  1 , Jeanette Assarsson  2 , Kristina Schildmeijer  1
Affiliations

Following a standardised pathway: Healthcare professionals' perspectives on person-centred care within ERAS for patients with colorectal cancer

Åsa Petersson et al. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To describe healthcare professionals' perceptions of person-centred care for patients with colorectal cancer, within the standardised care concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.

Background: International guidelines for colorectal surgery describe standardised perioperative care. Combining standardised care with person-centred care could be accomplished using the person-centred nursing framework for establishing and maintaining relationships with patients. Despite strong evidence for the standardised care concepts' medical benefits, studies concerning the practice of person-centred care from a nursing point of view are sparse.

Design: A qualitative descriptive design was used.

Methods: Four focus groups interviews were performed including 22 healthcare professionals with 1-29 years' experience of caring for patients with colorectal cancer. Data were analysed using qualitative conventional content analysis. The COREQ checklist for reporting qualitative research was used.

Results: Three themes emerged in the analysis; Framework in the healthcare system, Facing differences in participation and Interacting with the person beyond the illness. Conditions for person-centred care were related to the interactions between patients and healthcare professionals, the structure of care were also considered relevant.

Conclusion: There is a discrepancy between what is considered important to do and what is done in clinical practice to create conditions for patient participation. Interacting with patients and creating an interprofessional environment are important conditions, the structure of care is also a fundamental key to promoting person-centred care. There is a need for further improvement in care of patients with colorectal cancer to achieve person-centredness within standardised care.

Relevance to clinical practice: The findings provide valuable insights into what healthcare professionals consider to be important for achieving person-centred care. This knowledge can be useful in clinical practice and education programs.

Patient or public contribution: At the outset of the study, three patients were interviewed aimed at improving the conditions for the healthcare professionals' focus groups.

Keywords: care environment; colorectal surgery; content analysis; enhanced recovery after surgery; focus groups; health care professionals; person-centred care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aasa, A., Hovbäck, M., & Bertero, C. M. (2013). The importance of preoperative information for patient participation in colorectal surgery care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(11-12), 1604-1612. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12110
    1. Andreasson, A., Hagström, H., Sköldberg, F., Önnerhag, K., Carlsson, A. C., Schmidt, P. T., & Forsberg, A. M. (2019). The prediction of colorectal cancer using anthropometric measures: A Swedish population-based cohort study with 22 years of follow-up. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 7(9), 1250-1260. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640619854278
    1. Appleton, L., Poole, H., & Wall, C. (2018). Being in safe hands: Patients' perceptions of how cancer services may support psychological well-being. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(7), 1531-1543. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13553
    1. Avallin, T., Muntlin Athlin, Å., Elgaard Sørensen, E., Kitson, A., Björck, M., & Jangland, E. (2018). Person-centred pain management for the patient with acute abdominal pain: An ethnography informed by the Fundamentals of Care framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(11), 2596-2609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13739
    1. Batalden, M., Batalden, P., Margolis, P., Seid, M., Armstrong, G., Opopari-Arrigan, L., & Hartung, H. (2016). Coproduction of healthcare services. BMJ Quality and Safety, 25(7), 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315

LinkOut - more resources