Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Oct 3:13:997364.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.997364. eCollection 2022.

Atopy as an independent predictor for long-term patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Atopy as an independent predictor for long-term patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation

Raphaël Porret et al. Front Immunol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Atopy is a genetic condition predisposing individuals to develop immunoglobulin E (IgE) against common allergens through T-helper 2 (Th2) polarization mechanisms. The impact of atopy on graft survival in solid organ transplantation is unknown.

Methodology: We analyzed 268 renal allograft recipients from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study, a prospective multicenter cohort studying patients after solid organ transplantation, with a 9-year median follow-up (IQR 3.0). We used the Phadiatop assay to measure IgE antibodies against a mixture of common inhaled allergens (grass, tree, herbs, spores, animals, and mites) to identify pre-transplantation atopic patients (>0.35 KU/L).

Results: Of 268 kidney transplant recipients, 66 individuals were atopic (24.6%). Atopic patients were significantly younger than non-atopic patients (49.6 vs 58.0 years old, P = 0.002). No significant difference was found for gender, cold/warm ischemia time, preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA), HLA mismatches, induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, CMV serostatus, or cause of kidney failure. Patient and graft survival at ten years of follow-up were significantly better in the atopic group, 95.2% versus 69.2% patient survival (P < 0.001), and 87.9% versus 60.8% graft survival (P < 0.001), respectively. A multivariate Cox analysis revealed that atopy predicted recipient and graft survival independently of age and living donor donation. Finally, we found similar rates of biopsy-proven acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejections between atopic and non-atopic recipients.

Conclusion: Atopy was associated with better long-term patient and graft survival, independently of age and living donor donation after kidney transplantation. Yet, atopy should not be used as a predictor for acute rejection.

Keywords: atopy; graft survival; kidney; patient survival; rejection; survival; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Open access funding provided by University of Lausanne.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier estimates of ten-year follow-up. (A) Patient survival, and (B) kidney graft survival. The calculated p-values were obtained by the log-rank test (univariate analysis). Age-adjusted p-values were calculated with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. 95% confidence intervals are represented according to the group color.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates of ten-year follow-up stratified by atopic grade. (A) Number of patients in each subgroup based on Phadiatop grading. (B) Patient survival and (C) graft survival across all groups. The calculated p-values were obtained by the log-rank test (univariate analysis).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biopsy-proven rejections in atopic and non-atopic groups. (A) Ten-year cumulative events of ACR and AMR according to the atopic status. (B) Banff score comparison of kidney biopsies in non-atopic and in atopic patients. Bars represent the average score of all biopsies performed in the non-atopic and atopic patients during follow-up. Intervals represent the standard error of the mean. C4d, C4d deposition; ptc, peritubular capillaritis; g, glomerulitis; ti, total inflammation; i, interstitial inflammation; cg, glomerulopathy; cv, fibrous intimal thickening; t, tubulitis; v, intimal arteritis; mm, mesangial matrix increase; ci, interstitial fibrosis; ct, tubular atrophy; ah, arteriolar hyalinosis; aah, alternative arteriolar hyalinosis.

References

    1. Hirahara K, Nakayama T. CD4 + T-cell subsets in inflammatory diseases: beyond the T h 1/T h 2 paradigm. Int Immunol (2016) 28(4):163–71. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxw006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Askar M. T Helper subsets & regulatory T cells: rethinking the paradigm in the clinical context of solid organ transplantation. Int J Immunogenet (2014) 41(3):185–94. doi: 10.1111/iji.12106 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kopf M, Gros GL, Bachmann M, Lamers MC, Bluethmann H, Köhler G. Disruption of the murine IL-4 gene blocks Th2 cytokine responses. Nature (1993) 362(6417):245–8. doi: 10.1038/362245a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yazdanbakhsh M, Kremsner PG, van Ree R. Allergy, parasites, and the hygiene hypothesis. Science (2002) 296(5567):490–4. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5567.490 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johansson SG, Hourihane JO, Bousquet J, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Dreborg S, Haahtela T, et al. . A revised nomenclature for allergy. an EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. Allergy (2001) 56(9):813–24. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.t01-1-00001.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances