Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;18(4):550-558.
doi: 10.1177/15563316221082632. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

A Systematic Review of Propensity Score Matching in the Orthopedic Literature

Affiliations
Review

A Systematic Review of Propensity Score Matching in the Orthopedic Literature

Gabriel R Arguelles et al. HSS J. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Propensity score matching (PSM) is a statistical technique used to reduce bias in observational studies by controlling for measured confounders. Given its complexity and popularity, it is imperative that researchers comprehensively report their methodologies to ensure accurate interpretation and reproducibility.

Purpose: This systematic review sought to define how often PSM has been used in recent orthopedic research and to describe how such studies reported their methods. Secondary aims included analyzing study reproducibility, bibliometric factors associated with reproducibility, and associations between methodology and the reporting of statistically significant results.

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were queried for studies containing "propensity score" and "match*" published in 20 orthopedic journals prior to 2020. All studies meeting inclusion criteria were used for trend analysis. Articles published between 2017 and 2019 were used for analysis of reporting quality and reproducibility.

Results: In all, 261 studies were included for trend analysis, and 162 studies underwent full-text review. The proportion of orthopedic studies using PSM significantly increased over time. Seventy-one (41%) articles did not provide justification for covariate selection. The majority of studies illustrated covariate balance through P values. We found that 19% of the studies were fully reproducible. Most studies failed to report the use of replacement (67.3%) or independent or paired statistical methods (34.0%). Studies reporting standardized mean differences to illustrate covariate balance were less likely to report statistically significant results.

Conclusion: Despite the increased use of PSM in orthopedic research, observational studies employing PSM have largely failed to adequately report their methodology.

Keywords: biostatistics; observational studies; propensity score matching; reproducibility; scientific reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A flow diagram of the search strategy. PSM Propensity Score Matching.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Trend analysis depicting the absolute and relative increase in orthopedic observational studies employing PSM over time. PSM Propensity Score Matching.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2008;27(12):2037–2049. - PubMed
    1. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Austin PC. Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2011;30(11):1292–1301. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Sturmer T. Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(12):1149–1156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarivate Analytics. 2018 journal citation reports: journals in the 2018 release of JCR; 2019. Available at: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/.... Accessed January 16, 2022.