Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;27(3):1235-1241.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04751-z. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

Apical transportation using Mtwo or Reciproc retreatment systems in severely curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study

Affiliations

Apical transportation using Mtwo or Reciproc retreatment systems in severely curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study

Isabelle L L Gomes et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To assess apical root canal transportation using Mtwo or Reciproc during retreatment of severely curved canals, using a multi-analytical approach.

Methods: Forty mesial canals from mandibular molars (Vertucci type IV) were evaluated before and after endodontic retreatment to compare apical transportation with Mtwo retreatment or Reciproc. The systems were used on the same root but alternating the mesial canals. The analyses were performed by micro-computed tomography. Four evaluations were performed: (a) longitudinal transportation, (b) horizontal transportation, (c) variation in the angle of curvature of the canal, and (d) canal-root width ratio. Horizontal transportation and canal-root width ratio were evaluated in 1-, 3-, and 5-mm levels.

Results: Longitudinal transportation occurred in all samples, with a mean of 0.13 mm for Mtwo and 0.17 mm for Reciproc. Horizontal transportation increased as distant from the apex was the evaluated level, in mean. However, the transport was not observed in all samples. The mean angle of curvature was 4.16 for Mtwo and 3.03 for Reciproc. Canal-root width decreased as distant from the apex was the evaluated level. No significant differences were observed considering all tested variables, independently of the retreatment system or evaluated level (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Mtwo retreatment and Reciproc presented similar apical transportation (horizontal or vertical).

Clinical relevance: Both Mtwo retreatment and Reciproc systems could be considered safe regarding apical transportation.

Keywords: Endodontic retreatment; Mtwo; Reciproc.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Siqueira JF Jr (2001) Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 34:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nair PN (2006) On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 39:249–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01099.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Ricucci D, Hulsmann M (2014) Causes and management of post-treatment apical periodontitis. Br Dent J 216:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.200 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E (2006) Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod 32:469–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silveira SB, Alves FRF, Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa JCN, Vieira VTL, Siqueira JF Jr, Lopes HP, Provenzano JC (2018) Removal of root canal fillings in curved canals using either Mani GPR or HyFlex NT followed by passive ultrasonic irrigation. J Endod 44(299–303):e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.012 - DOI

Substances

LinkOut - more resources