Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;16(S2):S22-S27.
doi: 10.14444/8273. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Current State of the Art

Affiliations

Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Current State of the Art

Augustus J Rush 3rd et al. Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) is the superimposition of a virtual environment on the real world. The use of AR in spine surgery continues to grow, with multiple companies and products becoming available. The proposed benefits of AR include decreased attention shift, decreased line-of-site interruption, opportunity for more minimally invasive approaches, decreased radiation exposure to the operative team, and improved pedicle screw accuracy. In this review, we examine our institutional experiences with utilization and implementation of some of the current AR products.

Keywords: 3D overlays; augmented reality; future technologies; heads-up navigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: Frank Phillips has stock options from a company involved in the manufacturing of a device examined in this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Augmedics XVision headset.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Surgeon views through the XVision headset demonstrating virtual 3-dimensional projection and 2-dimensional cross-sectional navigation cuts. Jamshidi needle in place.
Figure 3
Figure 3
View from display screen demonstrating live screw representation on the 3-dimensional model of the spine as well as on cross-sectional imaging (similar images are seen by the operating team in the heads-up display).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) A 3-dimensional spine representation demonstrating new instrumentation and previous pedicle screw start points. (B) Cross-sectional imaging demonstrating the ability to actively change the trajectory of the new implant.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Virtual 3-dimensional projection of the lumbar spine; virtual Jamshidi needle along with the orthogonal planes demonstrating placement of navigated needle. (B) Same cadaver specimen in prone position demonstrating the actual Jamshidi needle placement. Head to the left.

References

    1. Virk S, Qureshi S. Navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(Suppl 1):S25–S30. 10.21037/jss.2019.04.23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costa F, Cardia A, Ortolina A, Fabio G, Zerbi A, Fornari M. Spinal navigation: standard preoperative versus intraoperative computed tomography data set acquisition for computer-guidance system: radiological and clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(24):2094–2098. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318201129d - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tian N-F, Xu H-Z. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(4):895–903. 10.1007/s00264-009-0792-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molina CA, Phillips FM, Colman MW, et al. A cadaveric precision and accuracy analysis of augmented reality–mediated percutaneous pedicle implant insertion: presented at the 2020 AANS/CNS joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;1:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Molina CA, Theodore N, Ahmed AK, et al. Augmented reality–assisted pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(1):139–146. 10.3171/2018.12.SPINE181142 - DOI - PubMed