Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;127(12):2175-2185.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02013-z. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

Impact of the selective A2AR and A2BR dual antagonist AB928/etrumadenant on CAR T cell function

Affiliations

Impact of the selective A2AR and A2BR dual antagonist AB928/etrumadenant on CAR T cell function

Matthias Seifert et al. Br J Cancer. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been successfully translated to clinical practice for the treatment of B cell malignancies. The suppressive microenvironment of many malignancies is a bottleneck preventing treatment success of CAR T cells in a broader range of tumours. Among others, the immunosuppressive metabolite adenosine is present in high concentrations within many tumours and dampens anti-tumour function of immune cells and consequently therapeutic response.

Methods: Here, we present the impact of the selective adenosine A2A and A2B receptor antagonist AB928/etrumadenant on CAR T cell cytokine secretion, proliferation, and cytotoxicity. Using phosphorylation-specific flow cytometry, we evaluated the capability of AB928 to shield CAR T cells from adenosine-mediated signalling. The effect of orally administered AB928 on CAR T cells was assessed in a syngeneic mouse model of colon carcinoma.

Results: We found that immunosuppressive signalling in CAR T cells in response to adenosine was fully blocked by the small molecule inhibitor. AB928 treatment enhanced CAR T cell cytokine secretion and proliferation, granted efficient cytolysis of tumour cells in vitro and augmented CAR T cell activation in vivo.

Conclusions: Together our results suggest that combination therapy with AB928 represents a promising approach to improve adoptive cell therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Parts of this work have been performed for the doctoral thesis of MS at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. SE and SK are inventors of several patent applications filed by the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in the field of immunooncology. SE and SK received research support from TCR2 Inc and Tabby Therapeutics for work unrelated to the present manuscript. SK received research support from Arcus Biosciences to perform parts of the present study. US is a former employee of Arcus Biosciences and holds stocks from Arcus Biosciences and Amgen. The authors declare no other competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Adenosine inhibits CAR T cell activation.
a Schematic illustration of the rationale of combining CAR T cell therapy and AB928. b, c In all, 2.5 × 104 murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells were cocultured with 2.5 × 104 Panc02-EpCAM tumour cells for 24 h in the presence or absence of b NECA (titration from 0.1 nM to 10 µM) or c adenosine (titration from 1 µM to 100 µM + EHNA 2.5 µM). b IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α concentrations in the coculture supernatant were determined by ELISA. Data were normalised to the vehicle control condition. c IFN-γ concentrations in the coculture supernatant were determined by ELISA. b, c Data are shown as mean ± SEM of n = 3 independent experiments with each dot representing the mean value of an individual experiment. *P < 0.05 by two-sided t test.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. AB928 protects CAR T cells from adenosine mediated suppression.
a In all, 2.5 × 104 murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells were cocultured with 2.5 ×104 Panc02-EpCAM tumour cells for 24 h in the presence or absence of NECA (100 nM) and AB928 (titration from 0.1 nM to 10 µM). IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α concentrations in the coculture supernatant were determined by ELISA. Data were normalised to the vehicle control condition. b Also, 2.5 ×104 murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells were cocultured with 2.5 × 104 4T1, LL/2-EpCAM, T110299-EpCAM and CT26-EpCAM tumour cells for 24 h cells in the presence or absence of NECA (100 nM) and AB928 (100 nM). Cytokine concentrations in the coculture supernatant were determined by IFN-γ ELISA. c Intracellular staining of murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells activated with plate bound recombinant EpCAM for 18 h in the presence or absence of NECA (1 µM) and AB928 (1 µM). ac Data are shown as mean ± SEM of a, c n = 3 or b n = 4–5 independent experiments with each dot representing the mean value of an individual experiment. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. AB928 enables efficient CAR T cell effector responses in vitro.
a RTCA of coculture with 5 × 104 murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells and 2.5 × 104 Panc02-EpCAM tumour cells in the presence or absence of NECA (1 µM) and AB928 (1 µM). CAR T cells and treatments were added at the timepoint indicated by the arrow. b In all, 2.5 × 104 murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells were cocultured with 2.5 × 104 Panc02-EpCAM tumour cells for 24 h in the presence or absence of NECA (100 nM) and AB928 (100 nM). GzmB concentrations in the coculture supernatant were determined by ELISA. c, e In all, 105 murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells were activated with plate-bound recombinant EpCAM for c 18 h or e 48 h in the presence or absence of NECA (1 µM) and AB928 (1 µM). c Phenotypic characterisation of CAR T cells by flow cytometry. d Also, 105 murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells were cocultured with 2.5 × 105 CT26-EpCAM tumour cells. Expression of inhibitory receptors on CD8+CAR+ T cells by flow cytometry. e CAR T cell proliferation was determined by flow cytometry with counting beads at the beginning and end of the experiment. Data were normalised to baseline proliferation of unstimulated cells. a, c Representative experiment of n = 3 independent experiments. Data represents mean of technical replicates. b, e Data are shown as mean ± SEM of b n = 7 or e n = 3 independent experiments with each dot representing the mean value of an individual experiment. d Representative experiment of n = 3 independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of technical replicates. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. AB928 shields CAR T cells from immunosuppressive signalling in response to adenosine.
a, b Phospho-specific flow cytometry of CREB of murine anti-EpCAM CAR T cells after treatment with NECA (5 µM) and/or AB928 (titration from 10 nM to 10 µM). Data are shown as a representative histogram and b mean ± SEM of n = 3 independent experiments with each dot representing the mean value of an individual experiment. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Orally administered AB928 augments CAR T cell activation in vivo.
a Schematic illustration of the experimental setup. bd CAR+ T cells in the spleen were tracked and phenotyped by flow cytometry at the end of the experiment. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of control n = 10 mice and AB928 n = 8 mice. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 by two-sided t test.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. AB928 ameliorates activation of human CAR T cells in the presence of adenosine.
Coculture of 2.5 × 104 human a anti-MSLN-CD28z CAR T cells or b anti-MSLN-4-1BBz CAR T cells and 2.5 × 104 SUIT-2-MSLN tumour cells in the presence or absence of NECA (1 µM) and AB928 (titration from 10 nM to 1 µM). a, b After 24 h, IFN-γ and IL-2 concentrations in the coculture supernatant were determined by ELISA. c Coculture of 105 anti-MSLN-CD28z CAR T cells and 2.5 × 104 SUIT-2-MSLN tumour cells in the presence or absence of NECA (1 µM) and AB928 (1 µM). After 48 h, phenotype of CD8+ CAR+ T cells was determined by flow cytometry. ac Data are shown as mean ± SEM of n = 4–8 independent experiments with each dot representing the mean value of an individual experiment. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA.

References

    1. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD. Immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1974–82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4358. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leach Dana R, Krummel Matthew F, Allison James P. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science. 1996;271:1734–6. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5256.1734. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iwai Y, Ishida M, Tanaka Y, Okazaki T, Honjo T, Minato N. Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.192461099. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jenkins RW, Barbie DA, Flaherty KT. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Br J Cancer. 2018;118:9–16. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.434. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allard B, Allard D, Buisseret L, Stagg J. The adenosine pathway in immuno-oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:611–29. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0382-2. - DOI - PubMed