The ability of critical care nurses to identify pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis: A multicentre cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 36266743
- PMCID: PMC9912419
- DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1406
The ability of critical care nurses to identify pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis: A multicentre cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the ability of critical care nurses to identify pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis and analyse the possible influencing factors.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Methods: This study was conducted at 24 hospitals across 12 provinces in China. A self-made electronic questionnaire was used. Nurses identified and judged injuries according to the information provided.
Results: The average identification score for pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis was 9.00 ± 3.51 points, and only 2.16% of nurses scored ≥16 points. The average correct identification rate for pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis was 45%. The correct identification rate for stage 1 pressure injury was the highest, while those for stage 3, stage 4, deep tissue pressure injury and unstageable pressure injury were all lower than 50%; incontinence-associated dermatitis was also easily misjudged. Nurses' educational backgrounds, professional titles, job positions, hospital levels and learning frequency were the factors that affected their ability to identify pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis.
Keywords: classification; differential diagnostic ability; incontinence-associated dermatitis; nursing practice; pressure injury.
© 2022 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Beeckman, D. , Schoonhoven, L. , Fletcher, J. , Furtado, K. , Gunningberg, L. , Heyman, H. , Lindholm, C. , Paquay, L. , Verdú, J. , & Defloor, T. (2007). EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(6), 682–691. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04474.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beeckman, D. , Schoonhoven, L. , Fletcher, J. , Furtado, K. , Heyman, H. , Paquay, L. , De Bacquer, D. , & Defloor, T. (2010). Pressure ulcers and incontinence‐associated dermatitis: Effectiveness of the pressure ulcer classification education tool on classification by nurses. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 19(5), e3. 10.1136/qshc.2008.028415 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beeckman, D. , Van Lancker, A. , Van Hecke, A. , & Verhaeghe, S. (2014). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of incontinence‐associated dermatitis, incontinence, and moisture as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Research in Nursing & Health, 37(3), 204–218. 10.1002/nur.21593 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Black, J. , Gray, M. , Bliss, D. , Kennedy‐Evans, K. , Logan, S. , Baharestani, M. , Colwell, J. , Goldberg, M. , & Ratliff, C. (2011). MASD part 2: Incontinence‐associated dermatitis and intertriginous dermatitis: A consensus. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing, 38(4), 359–370; quiz 371–352. 10.1097/WON.0b013e31822272d9 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical