Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov;38(9):607-616.
doi: 10.1089/jop.2022.0048. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

Performance and Safety of a Sodium Hyaluronate Tear Substitute with Polyethylene Glycol in Dry Eye Disease: A Multicenter, Investigator-Masked, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Performance and Safety of a Sodium Hyaluronate Tear Substitute with Polyethylene Glycol in Dry Eye Disease: A Multicenter, Investigator-Masked, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

Marc Labetoulle et al. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the performance and safety of 2 tear substitutes containing sodium hyaluronate (SH); one containing 0.15% SH and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000, and the other containing 0.18% SH. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, noninferiority trial, 83 patients with moderate or severe dry eye disease underwent a 2-week washout, and were then randomly assigned (1:1) to receive SH plus PEG tear substitute (n = 45) or comparator SH tear substitute (n = 38) 3-6 times daily for 3 months. The primary performance endpoint was the change from baseline in the ocular surface fluorescein staining (OSFS) score on day 28 in the per-protocol (PP) population, according to the 15-point Oxford Scheme, with a noninferiority margin of 2. Results: Both groups improved significantly in terms of signs and symptoms. Among the 78 patients without major protocol deviations (the PP population), the OSFS score decreased by 2.9 ± 2.0 on day 28 from 5.4 ± 1.3 at baseline in the SH plus PEG group and by 2.3 ± 2.2 from 5.2 ± 1.4 in the comparator group (95% confidence interval of the difference: -1.2 to 0.3), demonstrating noninferiority. On day 90, the improvement in OSFS scores was significantly greater in the SH plus PEG group (P = 0.0002). The safety profiles were satisfactory in both groups. Conclusion: SH plus PEG tear substitute was noninferior to SH tear substitute in the studied population and may provide additional benefits in the long term. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02975102.

Keywords: clinical study; dry eye; ocular lubricant; polyethylene glycol; sodium hyaluronate; tear substitute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Marc Labetoulle has acted as an occasional consultant (in the last 5 years) for: ALCON, ALLERGAN, BAUSCH + LOMB, DMG, DOMPE, GSK, HORUS, MSD, NOVARTIS, PHE, QUANTEL, SANTEN, SHIRE, SIFI, THEA, and TOPIVERT. Bruno Mortemousque declares no disclosures.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Patient flow diagram. C-SH, 0.18% sodium hyaluronate group; ITT, intention to treat; PP, per protocol; SH-PEG, 0.15% sodium hyaluronate-polyethylene glycol 8000 group.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Ocular surface fluorescein staining score (mean ±95% confidence interval) at each visit in the per-protocol population. C-SH, 0.18% sodium hyaluronate group; SH-PEG, 0.15% sodium hyaluronate-polyethylene glycol 8000 group. *P = 0.0002.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
The global sum score of dry eye symptoms (mean ±95% confidence interval) in the per-protocol population. C-SH, 0.18% sodium hyaluronate group; SH-PEG, 0.15% sodium hyaluronate-polyethylene glycol 8000 group. *P = 0.0008; **P = 0.0026.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Quality of life assessments using the OSD-QoL® questionnaire: change from baseline (day 0) on day 90 in the per-protocol population. C-SH, 0.18% sodium hyaluronate group; SH-PEG, 0.15% sodium hyaluronate-polyethylene glycol 8000 group; CFB, change from baseline; *P value ≤0.024.

References

    1. Nelson JD, Craig JP, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II Introduction. Ocul Surf 2017;15:269–275; doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:334–365; doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moon JH, Kim KW, Moon NJ. Smartphone use is a risk factor for pediatric dry eye disease according to region and age: A case control study. BMC Ophthalmol 2016;16:188; doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0364-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:276–283; doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baudouin C, Aragona P, Van Setten G, et al. , ODISSEY European Consensus Group members. Diagnosing the severity of dry eye: A clear and practical algorithm. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98:1168–1176; doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304619 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources