Small-field dosimetry with detector-specific output correction factor for single-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy of single and multiple brain metastases
- PMID: 36272022
- DOI: 10.1007/s12194-022-00684-0
Small-field dosimetry with detector-specific output correction factor for single-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy of single and multiple brain metastases
Abstract
Recently, the International Atomic Energy Agency and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine reported correction factors (CFs) for detector-response variation considering the uncertainty in detector readings in small-field dosimetry. In this study, the effect of CFs on small-field dosimetry measurements was evaluated for single-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. The output factors (OPFs) were measured with and without CFs in a water-equivalent sphere phantom using TrueBeam with a flattening-filter-free energy of 10 MV. Five detectors were used in a perpendicular orientation: CC01, 3D pinpoint ionization chambers, unshielded SFD detector, shielded EDGE detector, and microDiamond detector. First, the square-field sizes were set to 5-100 mm using a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) field. The OPFs were evaluated in the presence and absence of CFs. Second, single-isocenter stereotactic irradiation was performed on 22 brain metastases in 15 patients following dynamic conformal arc (DCA) treatment. The equivalent field size was calculated using the MLC aperture for each planning target volume. For the OPFs, the mean deviations from the median of the doses measured with detectors other than the CC01 for square-field sizes larger than 10 mm were within ± 4.3% of the median without CFs, and ± 3.3% with CFs. For DCA plans, the deviations without and with CFs were - 2.3 ± 1.9% and - 4.8 ± 2.4% for CC01, - 1.1 ± 3.0% and 1.0 ± 1.6% for 3D pinpoint, 8.8 ± 3.0% and 2.9 ± 2.8% for SFD, - 3.1 ± 3.0% and - 13.5 ± 4.0% for EDGE, and 8.9 ± 2.1% and 0.8 ± 1.9% for microDiamond. This feasibility study confirmed that the deviation of the detectors can be reduced using an appropriate detector with CFs.
Keywords: Detector-dependent output correction factor; Multiple brain metastases; Patient-specific quality assurance; Small-field dosimetry.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.
Similar articles
-
Effect of angular dependence for small-field dosimetry using seven different detectors.Med Phys. 2023 Mar;50(3):1274-1289. doi: 10.1002/mp.16198. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 36583601
-
Small field output correction factors at 18 MV.Med Phys. 2023 Nov;50(11):7177-7191. doi: 10.1002/mp.16635. Epub 2023 Aug 2. Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 37531177
-
Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter-free stereotactic radiosurgery system.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 8;17(3):100-110. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5956. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016. PMID: 27167266 Free PMC article.
-
Output correction factors for nine small field detectors in 6 MV radiation therapy photon beams: a PENELOPE Monte Carlo study.Med Phys. 2014 Apr;41(4):041711. doi: 10.1118/1.4868695. Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 24694131
-
Determination of the KQclinfclin,Qmsr fmsr correction factors for detectors used with an 800 MU/min CyberKnife(®) system equipped with fixed collimators and a study of detector response to small photon beams using a Monte Carlo method.Med Phys. 2014 Jul;41(7):071702. doi: 10.1118/1.4881098. Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 24989371
Cited by
-
Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the helical diode array using volumetric-modulated arc therapy for small targets.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Jul;25(7):e14307. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14307. Epub 2024 Feb 16. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 38363044 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Patchell RA. The management of brain metastases. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00105-1 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Shuto T, Akabane A, Higuchi Y, Kawagishi J, Yamanaka K, Sato Y, Jokura H, Yomo S, Nagano O, Kenai H, Moriki A, Suzuki S, Kida Y, Iwai Y, Hayashi M, Onishi H, Gondo M, Sato M, Akimitsu T, Kubo K, Kikuchi Y, Shibasaki T, Goto T, Takanashi M, Mori Y, Takakura K, Saeki N, Kunieda E, Aoyama H, Momoshima S, Tsuchiya K. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70061-0 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, Villa S, Fauchon F, Baumert BG, Fariselli L, Tzuk-Shina T, Kortmann RD, Carrie C, Ben Hassel M, Kouri M, Valeinis E, van den Berge D, Collette S, Collette L, Mueller RP. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952–26001 study. J Clin Oncol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1655 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ogura K, Mizowaki T, Ogura M, Sakanaka K, Arakawa Y, Miyamoto S, Hiraoka M. Outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors with high risk factors. J Neurooncol. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0912-6 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Serna A, Puchades V, Mata F, Ramos D, Alcaraz M. Influence of multi-leaf collimator leaf width in radiosurgery via volumetric modulated arc therapy and 3D dynamic conformal arc therapy. Phys Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.01.011 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical