Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 22;32(1):45.
doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00311-w.

A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function

Affiliations

A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function

Lucy Honeycutt et al. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. .

Abstract

Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes and uncertainty surrounding their safety, we conducted a systematic review to determine the effects of e-cigarettes on measures of lung function. We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases via Ovid, the Cochrane CENTRAL database, and the Web of Science Core from 2004 until July 2021, identifying 8856 potentially eligible studies. A total of eight studies (seven studying immediate effects and one long-term effects, 273 total participants) were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Cochrane risk of bias tools. These studies suggest that vaping increases airway resistance but does not appear to impact forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), or FEV1/FVC ratio. However, given the limited size and follow-up duration of these studies, larger, long-term studies are required to further determine the effects of e-cigarettes on lung function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of included studies assessing the effect of e-cigarettes on lung function.

References

    1. Foulds J, Veldheer S, Berg A. Electronic cigarettes (e‐cigs): views of aficionados and clinical/public health perspectives. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2011;65:1037–1042. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02751.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bozier J, et al. The evolving landscape of e-cigarettes: a systematic review of recent evidence. Chest. 2020;157:1362–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. CDC. About electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes). https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/ecigarettes/about-e-cigare... (2020)
    1. Blount BC, et al. Vitamin E acetate in bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid associated with EVALI. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:697–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916433. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Palamidas A, et al. Acute effect of an e-cigarette with and without nicotine on lung function. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2014;12:A34–A34.

Publication types

Grants and funding