Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Nov;3(11):e740-e753.
doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00199-4. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

Associations between social connections and cognition: a global collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Associations between social connections and cognition: a global collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis

Suraj Samtani et al. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Poor social connections (eg, small networks, infrequent interactions, and loneliness) are modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline. Existing meta-analyses are limited by reporting aggregate responses, a focus on global cognition, and combining social measures into single constructs. We aimed to investigate the association between social connection markers and the rate of annual change in cognition (ie, global and domain-specific), as well as sex differences, using an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Methods: We harmonised data from 13 longitudinal cohort studies of ageing in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they had baseline data for social connection markers and at least two waves of cognitive scores. Follow-up periods ranged from 0 years to 15 years across cohorts. We included participants with cognitive data for at least two waves and social connection data for at least one wave. We then identified and excluded people with dementia at baseline. Primary outcomes were annual rates of change in global cognition and cognitive domain scores over time until final follow-up within each cohort study analysed by use of an individual participant data meta-analysis. Linear mixed models within cohorts used baseline social connection markers as predictors of the primary outcomes. Effects were pooled in two stages using random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed the primary outcomes in the main (partially adjusted) and fully adjusted models. Partially adjusted models controlled for age, sex, and education; fully adjusted models additionally controlled for diabetes, hypertension, smoking, cardiovascular risk, and depression.

Findings: Of the 40 006 participants in the 13 cohort studies, we excluded 1392 people with dementia at baseline. 38 614 individual participants were included in our analyses. For the main models, being in a relationship or married predicted slower global cognitive decline (b=0·010, 95% CI 0·000-0·019) than did being single or never married; living with others predicted slower global cognitive (b=0·007, 0·002-0·012), memory (b=0·017, 0·006-0·028), and language (b=0·008, 0·000-0·015) decline than did living alone; and weekly interactions with family and friends (b=0·016, 0·006-0·026) and weekly community group engagement (b=0·030, 0·007-0·052) predicted slower memory decline than did no interactions and no engagement. Never feeling lonely predicted slower global cognitive (b=0·047, 95% CI 0·018-0·075) and executive function (b=0·047, 0·017-0·077) decline than did often feeling lonely. Degree of social support, having a confidante, and relationship satisfaction did not predict cognitive decline across global cognition or cognitive domains. Heterogeneity was low (I2=0·00-15·11%) for all but two of the significant findings (association between slower memory decline and living with others [I2=58·33%] and community group engagement, I2=37·54-72·19%), suggesting robust results across studies.

Interpretation: Good social connections (ie, living with others, weekly community group engagement, interacting weekly with family and friends, and never feeling lonely) are associated with slower cognitive decline.

Funding: EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research grant, funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, and the US National Institute on Aging of the US National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests HB declares consulting fees from Biogen; advisory board fees from Nutricia, Roche, Skin2Neuron, and Cranbrook Care; and grant funding through the EU Joint Programme–Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) from the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia. DML declares funding to their institution by the US National Institute on Aging–National Institutes of Health (NIA–NIH) award (number RF1AG05753 1RF1AG057531–01). RM declares funding from the JPND. HW declares a research grant from the JPND for the SHARED project (grant number HESOCARE-329–109). PSS declares payments for advisory board meetings for Biogen Australia and Roche Australia, and funding to the university for another cohort study (OATS), unrelated to the submitted work. SSa declares payments for lectures from New York University Sydney and University of Sydney; grant funding from the Dementia Australia Research Foundation, unrelated to the submitted work; and grant funding from the JPND and National Health and Medical Research Council Australia. NS declares that they are the chair of the data safety monitoring board for a study funded by the NIH at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. DS declares funding under the aegis of the JPND (National Center for Research and Development in Poland, project number JPND/06/2020). JM declares funding as part of the SHARED consortium, a JPND that is supported by the Alzheimer's Society (reference 469) in the UK. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Associations between social connection markers and global cognition
Markers are categorised by structure, function, and quality. Data presented are for main (partially adjusted) models.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Associations between social connection markers and memory
Markers are categorised by structure, function, and quality. Data presented are for main (partially adjusted) models.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Associations between social connection markers and language
Markers are categorised by structure, function, and quality. Data presented are for main (partially adjusted) models. The meta-analytic model for the association between loneliness and language could not be run because data were available for only the H70 study.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Associations between social connection markers and executive function
Markers are categorised by structure, function, and quality. Data presented are for main (partially adjusted) models.

Comment in

  • Social connectedness and cognitive decline.
    Roth AR. Roth AR. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Nov;3(11):e723-e724. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00217-3. Epub 2022 Oct 20. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022. PMID: 36273486 No abstract available.

References

    1. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet 2020; 396: 413–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, et al. How should we define health? BMJ 2011; 343: d4163. - PubMed
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Steptoe A. Social isolation: an underappreciated determinant of physical health. Curr Opin Psychol 2022; 43: 232–37 - PubMed
    1. Perry BL, McConnell WR, Coleman ME, Roth AR, Peng SY, Apostolova LG. Why the cognitive ‘fountain of youth’ may be upstream: pathways to dementia risk and resilience through social connectedness. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18: 934–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vernooij-Dassen M, Moniz-Cook E, Verhey F, et al. Bridging the divide between biomedical and psychosocial approaches in dementia research: the 2019 INTERDEM manifesto. Aging Ment Health 2021; 25: 206–12. - PubMed

Publication types