Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 23;17(1):384.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02547-8.

Improved upper limb function in non-ambulant children with SMA type 2 and 3 during nusinersen treatment: a prospective 3-years SMArtCARE registry study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Improved upper limb function in non-ambulant children with SMA type 2 and 3 during nusinersen treatment: a prospective 3-years SMArtCARE registry study

Astrid Pechmann et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The development and approval of disease modifying treatments have dramatically changed disease progression in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Nusinersen was approved in Europe in 2017 for the treatment of SMA patients irrespective of age and disease severity. Most data on therapeutic efficacy are available for the infantile-onset SMA. For patients with SMA type 2 and type 3, there is still a lack of sufficient evidence and long-term experience for nusinersen treatment. Here, we report data from the SMArtCARE registry of non-ambulant children with SMA type 2 and typen 3 under nusinersen treatment with a follow-up period of up to 38 months.

Methods: SMArtCARE is a disease-specific registry with data on patients with SMA irrespective of age, treatment regime or disease severity. Data are collected during routine patient visits as real-world outcome data. This analysis included all non-ambulant patients with SMA type 2 or 3 below 18 years of age before initiation of treatment. Primary outcomes were changes in motor function evaluated with the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM).

Results: Data from 256 non-ambulant, pediatric patients with SMA were included in the data analysis. Improvements in motor function were more prominent in upper limb: 32.4% of patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in RULM and 24.6% in HFMSE. 8.6% of patients gained a new motor milestone, whereas no motor milestones were lost. Only 4.3% of patients showed a clinically meaningful worsening in HFMSE and 1.2% in RULM score.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements or stabilization of disease progression in non-ambulant, pediatric patients with SMA under nusinersen treatment. Changes were most evident in upper limb function and were observed continuously over the follow-up period. Our data confirm clinical trial data, while providing longer follow-up, an increased number of treated patients, and a wider range of age and disease severity.

Keywords: Later-onset; Nusinersen; SMArtCARE; Sitter; Spinal muscular atrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Pechmann received compensation for advisory boards, training activities and research grants from Novartis and Biogen. C. Weiß received compensation for advisory boards, publications and/or presentations from Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. M. Baumann received compensation for advisory boards and speakers honoraria from Novartis, Biogen and Roche. M. Flotats-Bastardas received compensation for advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis and Roche. R. Trollmann reports personal fees from Desitin Pharma, Novartis, PTC Therapeutics. M. Weiler received compensation for advisory boards, consultant and speaker honoraria and/or financial support for conference attendances from Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Pfizer, Roche, and Sobi. S. Illsinger received compensation for advisory board/consultant work from Novartis. A. Bertsche reports grants from UCB Pharma GmbH and honoraria for speaking engagements and advisory boards from Biogen GmbH, Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH, Eisai GmbH, GW Pharma GmbH, Neuraxpharm GmbH, Shire/Takeda GmbH, UCB Pharma GmbH, and ViroPharma GmbH. A. Eisenkölbl received honoraria for advisory boards, interviews and speaking engegements from Biogen, Novartis and Roche. K. Vill received speaker honoraria and travel expenses from Novartis, Biogen and Santhera. M.C. Walter received compensation for advisory boards, funding for travel or speaker honoraria, and research support from Biogen, Novartis, and Roche. J. Johannsen received honoraria for advisory board participation and/or lectures and/or manuscript writing from Avexis/Novartis, Biogen, Roche, PTC, Pfizer and Sarepta Th., respectively. C. Reihle reports travel expenses from Biogen. R. Günther received compensation for advisory boards and research support from Biogen and compensation for advisory boards from Hofmann La-Roche. T. Hagenacker received compensation for advisory boards, lectures and research grants from Novartis, Biogen and Roche. V. Horber participated in workshops and received compensation for advisory boards from Novartis and Biogen. C. Köhler received honoraria from Roche, PTC, Biogen and Genzyme. M. Müller received compensation for expert meetings and training vom Norvartis, Biogen and Roche. O. Schwarz received compensation for advisory boards and training activities and research grants from Novartis and Biogen. I. Cordts received personal fees from Biogen (speaker’s honoraria, participation in advisory boards) outside the submitted work. M. Smitka received funding for educational activities and participation in advisory boards concerning SMA from Novartis Gene Therapies, Biogen and Roche. A. Schwerin-Nagel received compensation for an advisory board from Novartis Gene Therapies. H. Kölbel received compensation for presentations and consultancy from Avexis, Biogen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. K. Schlachter received compensation for advisory boards from Novartis, Biogen and Roche. J. Friese received compensation for an advisory board from Novartis Gene Therapies. A. Ziegler receives honoraria for advisory boards and speaker honoraria from Novartis Gene Therapies, Roche Pharma and Biogen. His institution receives research grants from Biogen. G. Bernert receives research suppert from PTC and honoraria from Novartis Gene Therapies, PTC, Biogen, Roche, Pfizer, Santhera. E. Wilichowski received compensation for advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis and Roche. H. Lochmüller received consultancy and financial support for research projects and clinical trials from Amplo Biotechnology, AMO Pharma, argenx, Biogen, Desitin, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Harmony Biosciences, KYE Pharmaceuticals, Milo Biotechnology, Novartis, Pfizer, PTC Therapeutics, Hoffman-La Roche Limited, Sanofi-Genzyme, Santhera, Sarepta, Satellos, Spark Therapeutics and Ultragenyx. HL is the Editor-in-chief for the Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases (IOS Press). J. Kirschner received support from Biogen, Novartis, Roche and ScholarRock for consultancy, educational activities and/or clinical research.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Probability to gain the ability to walk independently. Probability to gain the ability to walk independently under treatment with nusinersen in younger sitters (red) and older sitters (blue). Numbers at risk are listed for dedicated time-points. Colored areas indicate 99% confidence intervals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Longitudinal progression of HFMSE score. HFMSE score for younger sitters (blue), older sitters (red), lost sitters (yellow), and lost walkers (green). Data are listed as mean and 99% confidence interval. Available patients at baseline, m14, m26 and m38 are added. For a group size fewer than 10 patients no data are depicted
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Responder analysis HFMSE. Alluvial diagram to demonstrate changes in HMFSE over time for each cohort. Colors of columns indicate response groups according to changes in HFMSE score per time-period (baseline-m14, m14–m26, m26–m38). Lines between columns indicate the progression between time-periods
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Longitudinal progression of RULM score. RULM score for younger sitters (blue), older sitters (red), lost sitters (yellow) and lost walkers (green). Data are listed as mean and 99% confidence interval. Available patients at baseline, m14, m26 and m38 are added. The difference in cohort size is explained by incomplete data availability for all patients at all time-points. Further, RULM can only be performed in children from an age of 2 years
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Responder analysis RULM. Alluvial diagram to demonstrate changes in RULM over time for each cohort. Colors of columns indicate response groups according to changes in RULM score per time-period (baseline-m14, m14–m26, m26–m38). Lines between columns indicate the progression between time-periods

References

    1. Lefebvre S, Bürglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80:155–165. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lorson CL, Androphy EJ. An exonic enhancer is required for inclusion of an essential exon in the SMA-determining gene SMN. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:259–265. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.2.259. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prior TW, Swoboda KJ, Scott HD, Hejmanowski AQ. Homozygous SMN1 deletions in unaffected family members and modification of the phenotype by SMN2. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;130A:307–310. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30251. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S. Natural history in proximal spinal muscular atrophy. Clinical analysis of 445 patients and suggestions for a modification of existing classifications. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:518–523. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540290108025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farrar MA, Vucic S, Johnston HM, Du Sart D, Kiernan MC. Pathophysiological insights derived by natural history and motor function of spinal muscular atrophy. J Pediatr. 2013;162:155–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.067. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types