Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of gabapentin in chronic female pelvic pain without another diagnosis
- PMID: 36274967
- PMCID: PMC9563541
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100042
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of gabapentin in chronic female pelvic pain without another diagnosis
Abstract
Background: While widely used for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain, limited data exists on efficacy of gabapentin, especially in the subgroup of women suffering from chronic pelvic pain without a known diagnosis, such as endometriosis.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of gabapentin when administered to women with chronic pelvic pain without another diagnosis.
Study design: We performed a Systematic Review and Meta Analysis including all controlled clinical trials addressing the use of gabapentin for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain without another diagnosis. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.Gov, MEDLINE, and The Cochrane Library from inception of each database to April 30, 2021. We included all the studies that fulfilled the following criteria: (1) population: women suffering from chronic pelvic pain without another identified diagnosis (such as endometriosis); (2) intervention: gabapentin (regardless of the dosage); (3) comparator:placebo; (4) outcomes: pain score (visual analog scale) after 3 months and pain score (visual analog scale) after 6 months as primary outcomes; and (5) study design: we only included randomized or controlled clinical trials. Our exclusion criteria included (1) uncontrolled clinical trials, (2) studies that did not report data or measures for any of our selected outcomes, (3) studies that included patients with surgically or clinically diagnosed endometriosis, or (4) studies with no full-text manuscript available. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We analyzed dichotomous outcomes as percentages and totals, whereas continuous outcomes were analyzed using mean difference, standard deviations, and relative 95% confidence intervals using the inverse variance method.
Results: We included 4 placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials. Analysis was hindered because half of the studies (n=2) used the visual analog scale pain score and the other half (n=2) used the numerical rating scale. The analysis showed that when compared with the placebo, gabapentin significantly lowered the visual analog scale pain score at 3 months (mean difference, 0.79; 1.23 to 0.35; P=.005) and 6 months (mean difference, 1.68; 2.30 to 1.05; P=.001) and the numerical rating scale pain score at 3 months (mean difference, 0.20; 0.25 to 0.15; P=.001). However, in terms of the numerical rating scale pain score after 6 months, the 2 groups showed no significant difference (mean difference, 0.27; 0.80 to 0.26; P=.32).
Conclusion: Gabapentin may hold benefit for the management of chronic pelvic pain, with significant improvement in pain seen in both scales at 3 months when compared with the placebo, but only in the visual analog scale group at 6 months of usage. Secondary to the differences in the nature of the 2 scales, a further weighted combined analysis was not possible.
Keywords: chronic pelvic pain; gabapentin; meta-analysis; neurontin; pelvic pain.
© 2021 The Authors.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Pre- and postsurgical medical therapy for endometriosis surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD003678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003678.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33206374 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative gabapentin and post cesarean pain control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Dec 12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 30583095
-
Gabapentin has Longer-Term Efficacy for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review and Pilot Meta-analysis.Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):1673-1689. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00330-4. Epub 2021 Oct 4. Pain Ther. 2021. PMID: 34606030 Free PMC article.
-
Gabapentin for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Nov;300(5):1271-1277. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05272-z. Epub 2019 Aug 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 31435774 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of gabapentin and pregabalin in patients with vasomotor symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):564-579.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.011. Epub 2019 Dec 20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31870736
Cited by
-
Letter to the editor regarding systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of gabapentin in chronic female pelvic pain without another diagnosis.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Sep 1;2(3):100057. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100057. eCollection 2022 Aug. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022. PMID: 36276801 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Letter to the Editor regarding Meta-analysis of the efficacy of gabapentin: a response.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 May 5;2(3):100058. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100058. eCollection 2022 Aug. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022. PMID: 36276803 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Chronic pelvic pain. 2020. Available at: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articl.... Accessed April 4, 2021.
-
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Chronic pelvic pain, initial management (Green-Top Guideline No. 41). 2012. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg41/. Accessed April 4, 2021.
-
- Howard FM. The role of laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in chronic pelvic pain. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:467–494. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous