Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 5:13:992068.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992068. eCollection 2022.

Final validation of the mental health screening tool for depressive disorders: A brief online and offline screening tool for major depressive disorder

Affiliations

Final validation of the mental health screening tool for depressive disorders: A brief online and offline screening tool for major depressive disorder

Kiho Park et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Early screening for depressive disorders is crucial given that major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the main reasons of global burden of disease, and depression is the underlying cause for 60% of suicides. The need for an accurate screening for depression with high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in a brief and culturally adapted manner has emerged. This study reports the final stage of a 3-year research project for the development of depression screening tool. The developed Mental Health Screening Tool for Depressive Disorders (MHS:D) was designed to be administered in both online and offline environments with a high level of sensitivity and specificity in screening for major depressive disorder. A total of 527 individuals completed two versions (online/offline) of the MHS:D and existing depression scales, including the BDI-II, CES-D, and PHQ-9. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) for diagnostic sensitivity/specificity was also administered to all participants. Internal consistency, convergent validity, factor analysis, item response theory analysis, and receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis were performed. The MHS:D showed an excellent level of internal consistency and convergent validity as well as a one-factor model with a reasonable level of model fit. The MHS:D could screen for major depressive disorder accurately (0.911 sensitivity and 0.878 specificity for both online and paper-pencil versions). Item response theory analysis suggested that items from the MHS:D could provide significantly more information than other existing depression scales. These statistical analyses indicated that the MHS:D is a valid and reliable scale for screening Korean patients with MDD with high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, given that the MHS:D is a considerably brief scale that can be administered in either online or paper-pencil versions, it can be used effectively in various contexts, particularly during the pandemic.

Keywords: depression; diagnostic utility; item response theory; online assessment; psychometrics; screening tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve for MHS:D and existing depression measure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahn J.-K., Kim Y., Choi K.-H. (2019). The psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Korean version of GAD-7 and GAD-2. Front. Psych. 10:00127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00127, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association; (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Virginia: American Psychiatric Association
    1. Beck A. T., Steer R. A., Brown G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory 2nd Edn. San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation
    1. Brown T. A., Di Nardo P. A., Lehman C. L., Campbell L. A. (2001). Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for the classification of emotional disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 110, 49–58. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.49, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bujang M. A., Adnan T. H. (2016). Requirements for minimum sample size for sensitivity and specificity analysis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 10, YE01–YE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18129.8744 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources