Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 6:12:998388.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.998388. eCollection 2022.

Anti-cancer immune responses to DNA damage response inhibitors: Molecular mechanisms and progress toward clinical translation

Affiliations
Review

Anti-cancer immune responses to DNA damage response inhibitors: Molecular mechanisms and progress toward clinical translation

Lindsey Carlsen et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

DNA damage response inhibitors are widely used anti-cancer agents that have potent activity against tumor cells with deficiencies in various DNA damage response proteins such as BRCA1/2. Inhibition of other proteins in this pathway including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, or ATM can sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and such combinations are currently being tested in clinical trials for treatment of many malignancies including breast, ovarian, rectal, and lung cancer. Unrepaired DNA damage induced by DNA damage response inhibitors alone or in combination with radio- or chemotherapy has a direct cytotoxic effect on cancer cells and can also engage anti-cancer innate and adaptive immune responses. DNA damage-induced immune stimulation occurs by a variety of mechanisms including by the cGAS/STING pathway, STAT1 and downstream TRAIL pathway activation, and direct immune cell activation. Whether or not the relative contribution of these mechanisms varies after treatment with different DNA damage response inhibitors or across cancers with different genetic aberrations in DNA damage response enzymes is not well-characterized, limiting the design of optimal combinations with radio- and chemotherapy. Here, we review how the inhibition of key DNA damage response enzymes including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, and ATM induces innate and adaptive immune responses alone or in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or immunotherapy. We also discuss current progress in the clinical translation of immunostimulatory DNA-damaging treatment regimens and necessary future directions to optimize the immune-sensitizing potential of DNA damage response inhibitors.

Keywords: ATM; ATR; CHK1/2; DNA damage response (DDR); DNA-PK; WEE1; cGAS/STING; immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mechanism of immune activation by inhibition of DNA damage repair proteins. PARP, ATR, CHK1/2, WEE1, ATM, and DNA-PK play roles in DNA repair pathways including base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR), and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) to induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, and/or DNA repair. Inhibition of DNA damage repair proteins (red inhibitor lines) results in cell cycle progression, unrepaired DNA damage, and accumulation of cytosolic micronuclei that contain fragments of DNA (1). This results in activation of the STAT1 (2, 3), cGAS/STING (4), and TRAIL pathways as well as direct activation of immune cells (5, 6) to induce an anti-tumor immune response. The STAT1 pathway induces IFN-γ, which can increase levels of death receptor ligands including TRAIL (7), FasL (8), and TNF (9). The cGAS/STING pathway induces an IFN-I response, which also contributes to increased levels of death receptor ligands (–13) as well as contributes directly to anti-tumor immunity (14). Created in BioRender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maresca L, Stecca B, Carrassa L. Novel therapeutic approaches with DNA damage response inhibitors for melanoma treatment. Cells (2022) 11(9):1466. doi: 10.3390/cells11091466 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taniguchi H, Caeser R, Chavan SS, Zhan YA, Chow A, Manoj P, et al. . Wee1 inhibition enhances the antitumor immune response to pd-L1 blockade by the concomitant activation of sting and Stat1 pathways in sclc. Cell Rep (2022) 39(7):110814. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110814 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Owen KL, Brockwell NK, Parker BS. Jak-stat signaling: A double-edged sword of immune regulation and cancer progression. Cancers (Basel) (2019) 11(12):2002. doi: 10.3390/cancers11122002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liao W, Du C, Wang J. The cgas-sting pathway in hematopoiesis and its physiopathological significance. Front Immunol (2020) 11:573915. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.573915 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lutfi N, Galindo-Campos MA, Yélamos J. Impact of DNA damage response-targeted therapies on the immune response to tumours. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(23):6008. doi: 10.3390/cancers13236008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed