Transfemoral versus transcarotid access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- PMID: 36276673
- PMCID: PMC9579710
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.05.019
Transfemoral versus transcarotid access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) through a transfemoral (TF) and transcarotid (TC) access at our institution.
Methods: From January 2014 to January 2020, 62 TC-TAVR and 449 TF-TAVR were performed using 2 prosthesis devices (Edwards SAPIEN 3, n = 369; Medtronic Evolut R, n = 142). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for imbalance in the baseline characteristics of the study groups.
Results: Propensity score matching provided 62 matched pairs with comparable operative risk (mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, TC-TAVR 7.6% vs TF-TAVR 6.6%, P = .17). Thirty-day mortality (4.8% vs 3.2%, P = 1.00) and 2-year mortality (11.3% vs 12.9%, P = .64) after TC-TAVR were comparable with TF-TAVR. Strokes were numerically more frequent after TC-TAVR compared with TF-TAVR (3.2% vs 0%, P = .23), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. TF-TAVR was associated with a significantly greater risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (29.0% vs 12.9%, P = .04) compared with TC-TAVR. Other complications were not frequent and were similarly distributed between the matched groups.
Conclusions: TC access for TAVR was associated with satisfactory results compared to the femoral access. TC-TAVR could be considered a valid and safe alternative to TF-TAVR when femoral access is contraindicated.
Keywords: EuroSCORE II, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II; Fr, French; TAVI; TAVR; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; TC, transcarotid; TF, transfemoral; aortic stenosis; carotid artery; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
Figures


References
-
- Baumgartner H., Falk V., Bax J.J., De Bonis M., Hamm C., Holm P.J., et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739–2791. - PubMed
-
- Nishimura R.A., Otto C.M., Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Erwin J.P., Fleisher L.A., et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:252–289. - PubMed
-
- Leon M.B., Smith C.R., Mack M., Miller D.C., Moses J.W., Svensson L.G., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–1607. - PubMed
-
- Généreux P., Webb J.G., Svensson L.G., Kodali S.K., Satler L.F., Fearon W.F., et al. Vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1043–1052. - PubMed
-
- Rajagopal R., More R.S., Roberts D.H. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation through a transcarotid approach under local anesthesia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:903–907. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous