The influence of physical and mental workload on the safe behavior of employees in the automobile industry
- PMID: 36276745
- PMCID: PMC9582718
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11034
The influence of physical and mental workload on the safe behavior of employees in the automobile industry
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the influence of physical and mental workload on safe behavior of employees in the automobile industry. The 150 workers of the two industries of machining and foundry of an automobile parts manufacturer participated in this correlational study. Safety behavior, NASA-TLX, and Borg scale questionnaires were used to collect data. Independent t-test, analysis of variance and Pearson correlation coefficient applied to the analysis of data. The NASA-TLX showed that the dimensions of physical and mental demand had the highest score and the performance had the lowest score. Excessive physical pressure was also reported among workers. The Score of safety observance, safety participation, and safety behavior were at a moderate level. There was a significant difference in the physical workload of employees who had an accident and did not have an accident (P = 0.001). The results showed that if the same mental workload had been imposed on workers and simultaneously more physical workload had been experienced, the probability of an accident increased. The overall mental workload and physical pressure among workers were reported at a high level. Safe behaviors were moderate among employees. Therefore, the implementation of effective intervention programs to adjust workload, participatory ergonomics, provide workload balance to improve job satisfaction, eliminate inappropriate working conditions and increase the number of operators, management programs such as job rotation between Machining and Foundry and other workshops, increase rest time and creation of a strong teamwork safety climate can reduce physical and mental workload and prevent accident among workers, improve their performance and wellbeing.
Keywords: Mental workload; Physical workload; Safe behavior.
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Christian M.S., Bradley J.C., Wallace J.C., Burke M.J. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J. Appl. Psychol. 2009;94(5):1103. - PubMed
-
- Li F., Jiang L., Yao X., Li Y. Job demands, job resources and safety outcomes: the roles of emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013;51:243–251. - PubMed
-
- International Labor Organization Safety and Health at Work. 2018. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/lang&en/inde... Retrieved from:
-
- Heinrich H.W., Petersen D.C., Roos N.R., Hazlett S. McGraw-Hill Companies; New York: 1980. Industrial Accident Prevention. 1980.
-
- Beus J.M., Dhanani L.Y., McCord M.A. A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: addressing unanswered questions. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015;100(2):481. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources