Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 10;8(10):e11020.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11020. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Raw cow milk nutritional content and microbiological quality predictors of South Gondar zone dairy farmers in Ethiopia, 2020

Chalachew Yenew  1 , Fitalew Tadele  2 , Binyam Minuye  3 , Ermiyas Sisay  3 , Tadesse Asmamaw  4 , Sileshi Mulatu  5 , Biruk Demissie  1
Affiliations

Raw cow milk nutritional content and microbiological quality predictors of South Gondar zone dairy farmers in Ethiopia, 2020

Chalachew Yenew et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Background: Raw milk is a good growth medium for microbes because of its neutral pH and nutrient content. In Ethiopia; few studies were done to assess the microbial quality of raw cow milk. But, none of them focused on the nutrient content of raw cow milk. Therefore; this study aimed at evaluating raw cow milk nutrient content and predictors of microbial quality of raw cow milk among milk in the dairy farmers of South Gondar zone (SGZ), Ethiopia.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2020. 160 randomly selected raw cow milk, water, and utensil samples each were collected for microbial analysis. Besides, nutrient content indicators such as TotalSolid (TS), and Specific Gravity (SG) were analyzed from milk samples. Sequentially, The Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) of millers were also assessed using a pretested structured questionnaire. Chi-square test and multiple linear regression models were used.

Results: The overall mean SG and TS of raw cow milk were 1.027 (95% CI, 1.013-1.039) and 12.55% (95%CI, 12.20%-12.89%) respectively.38.13% had the better nutrient content, and the rest, 61.87% of raw cow milk hadn't the better nutrient content. Besides, the mean (SD) in log CFU/100mL-1of the Escherichia coli count of raw cow milk was 15 (0.3). Educational status, milk handling experience, KAP of milkers, water microbial count, Nutrient content, and microbial load of milk utensils were independently predicted microbial quality of raw cow milk.

Conclusions and implications: The result signifies that the raw cow milk hadn't better nutrient content and the educational status and KAP of milkers, and the qualities of water were the major factors affecting the microbial quality of raw cow milk. It could greatly affect the Food and Nutrition Security of the country. Hence, measures should be taken to enhance the KAP of milkers for improving this enteropathy.

Keywords: Ethiopia; Food security; Milk quality; Milk safety; Raw milk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) of milk handlers in SGZ, Ethiopia, 2020.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lencho G.K., Seblewongel A.M. Assessment of dairy farmers hygienic milking practices and awareness on cattle milk-borne zoonoses in Bishoftu, Ethiopia. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health. 2018;10(2):45–54.
    1. Owusu-Kwarteng J., Akabanda F., Agyei D., Jespersen L. Microbial safety of milk production and fermented dairy products in africa. Microorganisms. 2020;8(5):1–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancino-Padilla N., Fellenberg M.A., Franco W., Ibáñez R.A., Vargas-Bello-Pérez E. Bacterias transmitidas por los alimentos en los productos lácteos: detección por técnicas moleculares. Cienc. Investig. Agrar. 2017;44(3):215–229.
    1. Agarwal A., Awasthi V., Dua A., Ganguly S., Garg V., Marwaha S.S. Microbiological profile of milk: impact of household practices. Indian J. Publ. Health. 2012;56(1):88–94. - PubMed
    1. Mehlhorn H. Food-borne disease burden epidemiology reference group. Encyclopedia of Parasitology. 2015;1–1

LinkOut - more resources