Real World Management of Anaphylaxis Versus the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidelines
- PMID: 36277549
- PMCID: PMC9581108
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29336
Real World Management of Anaphylaxis Versus the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidelines
Abstract
Objectives Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening immediate allergic reaction caused by the sudden systemic release of mediators from mast cells. This study aims to assess the current practice of emergency management of children and adults diagnosed with anaphylaxis at the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman, in line with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Methods This is an observational retrospective study of all anaphylaxis cases seen at the emergency department (ED) from January 2013 to January 2018 and compared with the management of anaphylaxis in the ED as per the NICE guidelines. Inclusion criteria were all patients, children (age 16 and below), and adults diagnosed with anaphylaxis based on the World Allergy Organization (WAO) criteria. Exclusion criteria are all cases labeled as anaphylaxis that did not match the WAO criteria for anaphylaxis. Results Of 100 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of anaphylaxis, 49 patients (49%) were true-anaphylaxis cases based on the WAO definition 16 were children (age 16 years and below), and 33 were adults ( age 16 years and above). The other 51 patients (51%) with misdiagnosed anaphylaxis were later diagnosed with spontaneous urticaria, septic shock, vocal cord dysfunction, severe asthma, and anxiety attack. All 49 patients with true-anaphylaxis appropriately received adrenaline intramuscularly at the ED. All 16 children were admitted, seen by an allergist, and received an adrenaline auto-injector when indicated. Only 5 of the 33 adults were admitted and seen by an allergist, and 4 of those required an adrenaline auto-injector upon discharge. The remaining 28 adults were discharged from the ED, and only 3 of these were referred to the allergist. None received an adrenaline auto-injector upon discharge from the ED, and no mention in the ED notes on patient education regarding allergen avoidance. Conclusion Third of the patients who presented to ED were children (<16 years), and two third were adults. Insect venom was the main reason for anaphylaxis in both age groups. There was an underutilization of adrenaline auto-injector prescriptions for adult patients. This could be very well improved by disseminating policies and guidelines to adult physicians.
Keywords: adrenaline auto-injector; anaphylaxis; angioedema; nice guidelines; oman; urticaria.
Copyright © 2022, Nasr et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Anaphylaxis management in a French pediatric emergency department: Lessons from the ANA-PED study.Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Aug;13(8):e12289. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12289. Clin Transl Allergy. 2023. PMID: 37632240 Free PMC article.
-
A regional approach to unmet needs in anaphylaxis.Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 May;48(3):88-93. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016. PMID: 27152604
-
Adrenaline in anaphylaxis treatment and self-administration: experience from an inner city emergency department.Allergy. 2017 Mar;72(3):492-497. doi: 10.1111/all.13060. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Allergy. 2017. PMID: 27709624
-
Review article: quality of follow-up care for anaphylaxis in the emergency department.Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Oct;27(5):387-93. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12458. Epub 2015 Aug 28. Emerg Med Australas. 2015. PMID: 26315372 Review.
-
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evidence of adrenaline administered via auto-injector for anaphylactic reactions: A review of literature.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;87(3):816-824. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14438. Epub 2020 Jul 8. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 32559814 Review.
References
-
- Anaphylaxis: assessment and referral after emergency treatment. [ Aug; 2022 ]. 2020. https://www.guidelines.co.uk/allergy/nice-anaphylaxis-guideline/234573.a... https://www.guidelines.co.uk/allergy/nice-anaphylaxis-guideline/234573.a... - PubMed
-
- Anaphylaxis in adolescent/adult patients treated in the emergency department: differences between initial impressions and the definitive diagnosis. Alvarez-Perea A, Tomás-Pérez M, Martínez-Lezcano P, Marco G, Pérez D, Zubeldia JM, Baeza ML. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26310044/ J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25:288–294. - PubMed
-
- Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis in infants and children. Cheng A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22211074/ Paediatr Child Health. 2011;16:35–40. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources