Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;27(2):182-200.
doi: 10.1177/10870547221130111. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

Are Reading Interventions Effective for At-Risk Readers with ADHD? A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Are Reading Interventions Effective for At-Risk Readers with ADHD? A Meta-Analysis

Elizabeth S M Chan et al. J Atten Disord. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Utilizing a multi-level meta-analytic approach, this review is the first to systematically quantify the efficacy of reading interventions for school-aged children with ADHD and identify potential factors that may increase the success of reading-related interventions for these children.

Method: 18 studies (15 peer-reviewed articles, 3 dissertations) published from 1986 to 2020 (N = 564) were meta-analyzed.

Results: Findings revealed reading interventions are highly effective for improving reading skills based on both study-developed/curriculum-based measures (g = 1.91) and standardized/norm-referenced achievement tests (g = 1.11) in high-quality studies of children with rigorously-diagnosed ADHD. Reading interventions that include at least 30 hours of intervention targeting decoding/phonemic awareness meet all benchmarks to be considered a Level 1 (Well-Established) Evidence-Based Practice with Strong Research Support for children with ADHD based on clinical and special education criteria.

Conclusions: Our findings collectively indicate that reading interventions should be the first-line treatment for reading difficulties among at-risk readers with ADHD.

Keywords: ADHD; meta-analysis; reading intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest: none

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of included studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aduen PA, Day TN, Kofler MJ, Harmon SL, Wells EL, & Sarver DE (2018). Social problems in ADHD: Is it a skills acquisition or performance problem?. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 40(3), 440–451. 10.1007/s10862-018-9649-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alderson RM, Rapport MD, & Kofler MJ (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral inhibition: a meta-analytic review of the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 35(5), 745–758. 10.1007/s10802-007-9131-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Otaiba S, & Fuchs D (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300–316. 10.1177/07419325020230050501 - DOI
    1. Assink M, & Wibbelink CJ (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology,12(3), 154–174.
    1. August GJ, & Garfinkel BD (1990). Comorbidity of ADHD and reading disability among clinic-referred children. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 18(1), 29–45. 10.1007/BF00919454 - DOI - PubMed