Biochronology of South African hominin-bearing sites: A reassessment using cercopithecid primates
- PMID: 36279427
- PMCID: PMC9659350
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2210627119
Biochronology of South African hominin-bearing sites: A reassessment using cercopithecid primates
Abstract
Despite recent advances in chronometric techniques (e.g., Uranium-Lead [U-Pb], cosmogenic nuclides, electron spin resonance spectroscopy [ESR]), considerable uncertainty remains regarding the age of many Plio-Pleistocene hominin sites, including several in South Africa. Consequently, biochronology remains important in assessments of Plio-Pleistocene geochronology and provides direct age estimates of the fossils themselves. Historically, cercopithecid monkeys have been among the most useful taxa for biochronology of early hominins because they are widely present and abundant in the African Plio-Pleistocene record. The last major studies using cercopithecids were published over 30 y ago. Since then, new hominin sites have been discovered, radiometric age estimates have been refined, and many changes have occurred in cercopithecid taxonomy and systematics. Thus, a biochronological reassessment using cercopithecids is long overdue. Here, we provide just such a revision based on our recent study of every major cercopithecid collection from African Plio-Pleistocene sites. In addition to correlations based on shared faunal elements, we present an analysis based on the dentition of the abundant cercopithecid Theropithecus oswaldi, which increases in size in a manner that is strongly correlated with geological age (r2 ∼0.83), thereby providing a highly accurate age-estimation tool not previously utilized. In combination with paleomagnetic and U-Pb data, our results provide revised age estimates and suggest that there are no hominin sites in South Africa significantly older than ∼2.8 Ma. Where conflicting age estimates exist, we suggest that additional data are needed and recall that faunal estimates have ultimately proved reliable in the past (e.g., the age of the KBS Tuff).
Keywords: Pleistocene; Pliocene; Theropithecus; chronology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Telling time with monkeys.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 13;119(50):e2217198119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217198119. Epub 2022 Dec 5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. PMID: 36469782 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Monkey fossils do not negate cosmogenic dating at Sterkfontein.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 28;120(13):e2300314120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300314120. Epub 2023 Mar 20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 36940323 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to Granger et al.: Multiple, independent lines of evidence suggest Sterkfontein is less than 2.8 My old.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 28;120(13):e2301351120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301351120. Epub 2023 Mar 20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 36940326 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Dart R. A., Australopithecus africanus the man-ape of South Africa. Nature 115, 195–199 (1925).
-
- Pickering R., et al. , U-Pb-dated flowstones restrict South African early hominin record to dry climate phases. Nature 565, 226–229 (2019). - PubMed
-
- Granger D. E., et al. , New cosmogenic burial ages for Sterkfontein Member 2 Australopithecus and Member 5 Oldowan. Nature 522, 85–88 (2015). - PubMed
-
- Balter V., et al. , U-Pb dating of fossil enamel from the Swartkrans Pleistocene hominid site, South Africa. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 267, 236–246 (2008).
-
- Fitch F. J., Miller J. A., Radioisotope age determinations of Lake Rudolf artefact site. Nature 226, 226–228 (1970). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
